Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437254›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Public perceptions of brain health: an international, online cross-sectional survey.

Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Athanasia Monika Mowinckel, Barbara Bodorkos Friedman, Klaus P Ebmeier, Christian A Drevon, Rebecca Bruu Carver, Enikő Zsoldos, Nanna Alida Grit Fredheim, Øystein Sørensen, William Frans Christiaan Baaré and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sleep Patterns and Human Brain Health.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Stakeholder engagement in European brain research: Experiences of the Lifebrain consortium.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Isabelle Budin-LjøsneDepartment of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway Isabelle.Budin.Ljosne@fhi.no.ORCID 0000-0002-4610-1662
Athanasia Monika MowinckelDepartment of Psychology, Center for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Barbara Bodorkos FriedmanDepartment of Psychology, Center for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Klaus P EbmeierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Christian A DrevonDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rebecca Bruu CarverDepartment of Communication, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Enikő ZsoldosDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nanna Alida Grit FredheimDepartment of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Øystein SørensenDepartment of Psychology, Center for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
William Frans Christiaan BaaréDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, København, Denmark.
Kathrine Skak MadsenDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, København, Denmark.
Anders M FjellDepartment of Psychology, Center for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rogier A KievitCognitive Neuroscience Department, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Paolo GhislettaFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
David Bartrés-FazDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura NawijnDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cristina Solé-PadullésDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Kristine B WalhovdDepartment of Psychology, Center for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sandra DüzelCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Larisa ZasyekinaDepartment of General and Clinical Psychology, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Luc'k, Ukraine.
Maria Florencia IulitaDepartment of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Teresa FerrettiWomen's Brain Project, Guntershausen, Switzerland.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate public perspectives on brain health.

designCross-sectional multilanguage online survey.

settingLifebrain posted the survey on its website and social media and shared it with stakeholders. The survey was open from 4 June 2019 to 31 August 2020.

participantsn=27 590 aged ≥18 years from 81 countries in five continents completed the survey. The respondents were predominantly women (71%), middle aged (41-60 years; 37%) or above (>60 years; 46%), highly educated (69%) and resided in Europe (98%).

main outcome measuresRespondents' views were assessed regarding factors that may influence brain health, life periods considered important to look after the brain and diseases and disorders associated with the brain. We run exploratory linear models at a 99% level of significance to assess correlates of the outcome variables, adjusting for likely confounders in a targeted fashion.

resultsOf all significant effects, the respondents recognised the impact of lifestyle factors on brain health but had relatively less awareness of the role socioeconomic factors might play. Most respondents rated all life periods as important for the brain (95%-96%), although the prenatal period was ranked significantly lower (84%). Equally, women and highly educated respondents more often rated factors and life periods to be important for brain health. Ninety-nine per cent of respondents associated Alzheimer's disease and dementia with the brain. The respondents made a connection between mental health and the brain, and mental disorders such as schizophrenia and depression were significantly more often considered to be associated with the brain than neurological disorders such as stroke and Parkinson's disease. Few respondents (<32%) associated cancer, hypertension, diabetes and arthritis with the brain.

conclusionsDifferences in perceptions of brain health were noted among specific segments of the population. Policies providing information about brain-friendly health behaviours and targeting people less likely to have relevant experience may be needed.

Indexed as

BrainPublic OpinionAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesdementiahealth policymental healthpreventive medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID35437254
PMCPMC9016409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.