Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436941›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2022

Microscopic nuclei classification, segmentation, and detection with improved deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN).

Zahangir Alom, Vijayan K Asari, Anil Parwani, Tarek M Taha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. BCNet: A Novel Network for Blood Cell Classification.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zahangir AlomDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. alomm1@udayton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2314-1207
Vijayan K AsariDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA.
Anil ParwaniDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Tarek M TahaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNuclei classification, segmentation, and detection from pathological images are challenging tasks due to cellular heterogeneity in the Whole Slide Images (WSI).

methodsIn this work, we propose advanced DCNN models for nuclei classification, segmentation, and detection tasks. The Densely Connected Neural Network (DCNN) and Densely Connected Recurrent Convolutional Network (DCRN) models are applied for the nuclei classification tasks. The Recurrent Residual U-Net (R2U-Net) and the R2UNet-based regression model named the University of Dayton Net (UD-Net) are applied for nuclei segmentation and detection tasks respectively. The experiments are conducted on publicly available datasets, including Routine Colon Cancer (RCC) classification and detection and the Nuclei Segmentation Challenge 2018 datasets for segmentation tasks. The experimental results were evaluated with a five-fold cross-validation method, and the average testing results are compared against the existing approaches in terms of precision, recall, Dice Coefficient (DC), Mean Squared Error (MSE), F1-score, and overall testing accuracy by calculating pixels and cell-level analysis.

resultsThe results demonstrate around 2.6% and 1.7% higher performance in terms of F1-score for nuclei classification and detection tasks when compared to the recently published DCNN based method. Also, for nuclei segmentation, the R2U-Net shows around 91.90% average testing accuracy in terms of DC, which is around 1.54% higher than the U-Net model.

conclusionThe proposed methods demonstrate robustness with better quantitative and qualitative results in three different tasks for analyzing the WSI.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerCell NucleusHumansAnd UD-netDigital pathologyDRCNNuclei detectionNuclei segmentationR2U-net

Identifiers

PMID35436941
PMCPMC9017017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.