Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436929›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2022

Fluid resuscitation with balanced crystalloids versus normal saline in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wei-Hua Dong, Wen-Qing Yan, Xin Song, Wen-Qiang Zhou, Zhi Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Practice Patterns and Management Protocols in Trauma across Indian Settings: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Hua Dong *Department of Emergency, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, 92 AiGuo St., Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Wen-Qing Yan *Department of Emergency, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, 92 AiGuo St., Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Xin SongDepartment of Emergency, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, 92 AiGuo St., Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Wen-Qiang ZhouDepartment of Emergency, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, 92 AiGuo St., Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Zhi ChenDepartment of Emergency, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, 92 AiGuo St., Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China. jxcz120@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9467-9151
Nanchang University · CNJiangxi Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82160020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravenous fluids are used commonly for almost all intensive care unit (ICU) patients, especially for patients in need of resuscitation. The selection and use of resuscitation fluids may affect the outcomes of patients; however, the optimal resuscitative fluid remains controversial.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Studies comparing balanced crystalloids and normal saline in ICU patients were selected. We used the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias in studies. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and new renal replacement therapy (RRT).

resultsA total of 35,456 patients from eight studies were included. There was no significant difference between balanced crystalloid solutions and saline in mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.92-1.01). The subgroup analysis with traumatic brain injury (TBI) showed lower mortality in patients receiving normal saline (RR:1.25; 95% CI 1.02-1.54). However, in patients with non-TBI, balanced crystalloid solutions achieved lower mortality than normal saline (RR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.99). There was no significant difference in moderate to severe AKI (RR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.01) or new RRT (RR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.84-1.04).

conclusionsCompared with normal saline, balanced crystalloids may not improve the outcomes of mortality, the incidence of AKI, and the use of RRT for critically ill patients. However, balanced crystalloids reduce the risk of death in patients with non-TBI but increase the risk of death in those with TBI. Large-scale rigorous randomized trials with better designs are needed, especially for specific patient populations.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjurySaline SolutionCritical IllnessCrystalloid SolutionsFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIsotonic SolutionsMaleCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSaline SolutionBalanced crystalloidsIntensive care unitMeta-analysisSalineTrial sequential analysis

Identifiers

PMID35436929
PMCPMC9013977
OpenAlexW4223998885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.