Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436924›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2022

Pesticides and environmental injustice in the USA: root causes, current regulatory reinforcement and a path forward.

Nathan Donley, Robert D Bullard, Jeannie Economos, Iris Figueroa, Jovita Lee, Amy K Liebman, Dominica Navarro Martinez, Fatemeh Shafiei

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
30.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan DonleyCenter for Biological Diversity, Portland, OR, USA. ndonley@biologicaldiversity.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9935-261X
Robert D BullardTexas Southern University, Houston, TX, USA.
Jeannie EconomosFarmworker Association of Florida, Apopka, FL, USA.
Iris FigueroaFarmworker Justice, Washington, DC, USA.
Jovita LeeAdvance Carolina, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Amy K LiebmanMigrant Clinicians Network, Salisbury, MD, USA.
Dominica Navarro MartinezNorthwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides, Eugene, OR, USA.
Fatemeh ShafieiSpelman College, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Farmworker Association of Florida · USFarmworker Justice · USMigrant Clinicians Network · USOffice of Diversity and Inclusion · USSpelman College · USTexas Southern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many environmental pollutants are known to have disproportionate effects on Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) as well as communities of low-income and wealth. The reasons for these disproportionate effects are complex and involve hundreds of years of systematic oppression kept in place through structural racism and classism in the USA. Here we analyze the available literature and existing datasets to determine the extent to which disparities in exposure and harm exist for one of the most widespread pollutants in the world - pesticides. Our objective was to identify and discuss not only the historical injustices that have led to these disparities, but also the current laws, policies and regulatory practices that perpetuate them to this day with the ultimate goal of proposing achievable solutions. Disparities in exposures and harms from pesticides are widespread, impacting BIPOC and low-income communities in both rural and urban settings and occurring throughout the entire lifecycle of the pesticide from production to end-use. These disparities are being perpetuated by current laws and regulations through 1) a pesticide safety double standard, 2) inadequate worker protections, and 3) export of dangerous pesticides to developing countries. Racial, ethnic and income disparities are also maintained through policies and regulatory practices that 4) fail to implement environmental justice Executive Orders, 5) fail to account for unintended pesticide use or provide adequate training and support, 6) fail to effectively monitor and follow-up with vulnerable communities post-approval, and 7) fail to implement essential protections for children. Here we've identified federal laws, regulations, policies, and practices that allow for disparities in pesticide exposure and harm to remain entrenched in everyday life for environmental justice communities. This is not simply a pesticides issue, but a broader public health and civil rights issue. The true fix is to shift the USA to a more just system based on the Precautionary Principle to prevent harmful pollution exposure to everyone, regardless of skin tone or income. However, there are actions that can be taken within our existing framework in the short term to make our unjust regulatory system work better for everyone.

Indexed as

PesticidesChildHumansIncomeRural PopulationSystemic RacismUnited StatesPesticidesAgrochemicalsChildren’s healthClassismEnvironmental justiceFarmworkersPesticidesRacismRegulationWorker safety

Identifiers

PMID35436924
PMCPMC9017009
OpenAlexW4224238950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.