Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436921›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2022

Ethnomedicinal landscape: distribution of used medicinal plant species in Nepal.

Ripu M Kunwar, Bikash Baral, Sanjeev Luintel, Yadav Uprety, Ram C Poudel, Binaya Adhikari, Yagya P Adhikari, Suresh C Subedi, Chandra K Subedi, Prakash Poudel and 12 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Ripu M KunwarEthnobotanical Society of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal. ripukunwar@gmail.com.
Bikash BaralUniversity of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Sanjeev LuintelAmrit Science College, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Yadav UpretyCentral Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ram C PoudelNepal Academy of Science and Technology, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Binaya AdhikariInstitute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Yagya P AdhikariBayCEER,, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Suresh C SubediDepartment of Biology, Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, AR, USA.
Chandra K SubediCentral Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Prakash PoudelGandaki University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Hem R PaudelNational Herbarium and Plant Laboratories (KATH), Lalitpur, Nepal.
Basanta PaudelSchool of Environmental Science and Management, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Laxmi Mahat KunwarDepartment of Anthropology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kul S UpadhayayaCentral Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Shandesh BhattaraiNepal Academy of Science and Technology, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Dipesh PyakurelResources Himalaya Foundation, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Durga H KutalUniversity of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, WI, USA.
Pramod PandeyFlorida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA.
Ananta BhandariWWF Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Gokarna J ThapaWWF Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Narel Y Paniagua ZambranaDepartment of Ethnobotany, Institute of Botany, School of Natural Sciences and Medicine, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Rainer W BussmannDepartment of Ethnobotany, Institute of Botany, School of Natural Sciences and Medicine, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of losing traditional knowledge of medicinal plants and their use and conservation is very high. Documenting knowledge on distribution and use of medicinal plants by different ethnic groups and at spatial scale on a single platform is important from a conservation planning and management perspective. The sustainable use, continuous practice, and safeguarding of traditional knowledge are essential. Communication of such knowledge among scientists and policy makers at local and global level is equally important, as the available information at present is limited and scattered in Nepal.

methodsIn this paper, we aimed to address these shortcomings by cataloguing medicinal plants used by indigenous ethnic groups in Nepal through a systematic review of over 275 pertinent publications published between 1975 and July 2021. The review was complemented by field visits made in 21 districts. We determined the ethnomedicinal plants hotspots across the country and depicted them in heatmaps.

resultsThe heatmaps show spatial hotspots and sites of poor ethnomedicinal plant use documentation, which is useful for evaluating the interaction of geographical and ethnobotanical variables. Mid-hills and mountainous areas of Nepal hold the highest number of medicinal plant species in use, which could be possibly associated with the presence of higher human population and diverse ethnic groups in these areas.

conclusionGiven the increasing concern about losing medicinal plants due to changing ecological, social, and climatic conditions, the results of this paper may be important for better understanding of how medicinal plants in use are distributed across the country and often linked to specific ethnic groups.

Indexed as

Plants, MedicinalEthnobotanyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMedicine, TraditionalNepalPhytotherapyCultureDistributionHeatmapsMedicinal plantsMountainsTraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID35436921
PMCPMC9016992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.