Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436913›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2022

Participant recall and understandings of information on biobanking and future genomic research: experiences from a multi-disease community-based health screening and biobank platform in rural South Africa.

Manono Luthuli, Nothando Ngwenya, Dumsani Gumede, Resign Gunda, Dickman Gareta, Olivier Koole, Mark J Siedner, Emily B Wong, Janet Seeley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Manono LuthuliAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. manono.luthuli@ahri.org.
Nothando NgwenyaAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Dumsani GumedeAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Resign GundaAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Dickman GaretaAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Olivier KooleAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Mark J SiednerAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Emily B WongAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Janet SeeleyAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Africa Health Research Institute · ZALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Evaluating UTT with a National HIV Cohort to Optimize South Africa's HIV Response (ENCORE)R01AI152149 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI BOR, JACOB, ONOYA, DORINA · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
Studies of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) cells in people with HIV, TB and HIV/TB co-infection in South AfricaK08AI118538 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WONG, EMILY BETH · 2015 to 2019
$950k
Quantification of patterns of multimorbidity to develop effective and efficient models of HIV, TB and NCD co-care in rural South AfricaR21TW011687 · FIC · KWAZULU-NATAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE TB-HIV · PI TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY, WONG, EMILY BETH · 2020 to 2021
$347k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW011687NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI118538NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI152149Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited research has been conducted on explanations and understandings of biobanking for future genomic research in African contexts with low literacy and limited healthcare access. We report on the findings of a sub-study on participant understanding embedded in a multi-disease community health screening and biobank platform study known as 'Vukuzazi' in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with research participants who had been invited to take part in the Vukuzazi study, including both participants and non-participants, and research staff that worked on the study. The interviews were transcribed, and themes were identified from the interview transcripts, manually coded, and thematically analysed.

resultsThirty-nine individuals were interviewed. We found that the research team explained biobanking and future genomic research by describing how hereditary characteristics create similarities among individuals. However, recollection and understanding of this explanation seven months after participation was variable. The large volume of information about the Vukuzazi study objectives and procedures presented a challenge to participant recall. By the time of interviews, some participants recalled rudimentary facts about the genetic aspects of the study, but many expressed little to no interest in genetics and biobanking.

conclusionParticipant's understanding of information related to genetics and biobanking provided during the consent process is affected by the volume of information as well as participant's interest (or lack thereof) in the subject matter being discussed. We recommend that future studies undertaking biobanking and genomic research treat explanations of this kind of research to participants as an on-going process of communication between researchers, participants and the community and that explanatory imagery and video graphic storytelling should be incorporated into theses explanations as these have previously been found to facilitate understanding among those with low literacy levels. Studies should also avoid having broader research objectives as this can divert participant's interest and therefore understanding of why their samples are being collected.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksPublic HealthGenomeHumansInformed ConsentSouth AfricaBiobankingEthicsGenomic researchInformed consentParticipant experiencesResearcher experiences

Identifiers

PMID35436913
PMCPMC9014601
OpenAlexW4223904867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.