Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436873›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Fit for LIFE: the development and optimization of an intervention delivered through prison gymnasia to support incarcerated men in making positive lifestyle changes.

Alice MacLean, Matthew Maycock, Kate Hunt, Craig Mailer, Keith Mason, Cindy M Gray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physical Activity and Associated Factors among Brazilian Adult Inmates: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Embodied masculinities and bodywork within two British prison gyms.Norma : Nordisk tidsskrift for maskulinitetsstudier = Nordic journal of masculinity studies · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alice MacLean *Institute of Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Matthew Maycock *School of Education and Social Work, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Kate HuntInstitute of Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling and Institute for Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Craig MailerHMP Perth, Perth, UK.
Keith MasonHMP Kilmarnock, Kilmarnock, UK.
Cindy M GrayInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. cindy.gray@glasgow.ac.uk.
University of Stirling · GBPerth Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity Hospital Crosshouse · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite prison settings presenting opportunities for healthy eating and regular exercise, many incarcerated men supplement prison food with unhealthy snacks and drinks, and are less likely to achieve recommended physical activity guidelines than non-incarcerated men. This paper describes the co-development with prison staff of a healthy lifestyle intervention for delivery to incarcerated men, and feasibility testing of its delivery through prison physical education departments.

methodsThe starting point for intervention development was Football Fans in Training (FFIT), an evidence-based intervention successful in engaging men and supporting them to lose weight, make positive lifestyle changes and maintain these long term. We iteratively tested and adapted FFIT for delivery in prison gym facilities through a four Phase pilot and optimisation study. Methods used to evaluate each phase included: observations of session deliveries; semi-structured interviews with participants; and a focus group/semi-structured interviews with prison Physical Education Instructors (PEIs) who delivered the programme. Data were analysed thematically using the Framework approach. Findings from each phase informed development of the optimised programme.

resultsWe iteratively co-developed a healthy lifestyle intervention (known as Fit for LIFE) tailored to the needs of incarcerated men and prison operational constraints. Fit for LIFE comprises elements specifically designed to address common barriers to a healthy lifestyle within prison, including: discussion of healthiest available food choices; trying out different physical activity options in the prison gym; and strategies (such as in-cell workouts) for dealing with prolonged time in cells at evenings/weekends. Weight loss was not always the most valued outcome. Instead, participants cited a wide range of behavioural, physical and mental health improvements as important to them, and were more motivated if they could focus on identifying and achieving personally relevant objectives.

conclusionsFit for LIFE is a 10-week, group-based healthy lifestyle programme tailored for delivery to incarcerated men in prison gymnasia. Weekly 90-min sessions include informative and interactive 'classroom' activities followed by a practical physical activity training session, often with group activities. Fit for LIFE aims to help incarcerated men to: increase physical activity; reduce sedentary time; eat more healthily; and start and maintain using prison gym facilities with confidence.

Indexed as

Fitness CentersPrisonersHealthy LifestyleHumansLife StyleMalePrisonsHealth behaviour changeHealthy eatingPhysical activityPrison, dietPrisoner healthSedentary behaviourWeightWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35436873
PMCPMC9017016
OpenAlexW4224250211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.