Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436859›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2022

A comparison of ondansetron and lidocaine in reducing injection pain of propofol: a randomized controlled study.

Wirat Wasinwong, Sarocha Termthong, Prae Plansangkate, Jutarat Tanasansuttiporn, Riam Kosem, Surewan Chaofan

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Major Adverse Cardiac Events with Ondansetron: A Systematic Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wirat WasinwongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, HatYai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand. wwasinwong@gmail.com.
Sarocha TermthongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, HatYai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Prae PlansangkateDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, HatYai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Jutarat TanasansuttipornDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, HatYai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Riam KosemDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, HatYai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Surewan ChaofanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, HatYai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Prince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect stimulation of the afferent nerve endings in the venous endothelium is one explanation of propofol injection pain. Previous studies found that ondansetron can also block sodium channels. This effect is similar to that of lidocaine.

objectiveThe primary outcome was the efficacy of ondansetron compared to lidocaine and placebo for the reduction of propofol injection pain.

methodThis trial was conducted in 240 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I-III and aged between 18-65 years old, undergoing elective surgery, and having a 20-gauge intravenous catheter at the hand dorsum. Each group of 80 patients received 8 mg. of ondansetron in the O Group, 40 mg. of lidocaine in the L Group and normal saline in the C Group. The study medications were blindly administered to the patients through a 20-gauge intravenous catheter placed on the hand dorsum, and then 1 min later, the small dose of propofol (50 mg.) was infused via the syringe pump at a rate of 600 ml/hr. for 30 s. Following that, the syringe pump of propofol was temporarily stopped, and the patients were asked to rate their pain at the injection site.

resultThe incidence of pain was lowest in the L group (66.2%) compared with the O (82.5%) and the C groups (85.0%) (P < 0.01). The median pain score in the L, O, and C groups were 2 (0-4), 4 (2-5), and 4.5 (2-6), respectively (P < 0.01). The incidences of no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain were also significantly different in the L group (33.8%, 37.5%, 21.2%, and 7.5%, respectively) compared with those in the O group (17.5%, 31.2%, 31.2%, and 20.0%, respectively) and the C groups (15.0%, 22.5%, 40.0%, and 22.5%, respectively) (P < 0.01).

conclusionPretreatment with intravenous lidocaine, rather than ondansetron, can reduce the incidence and intensity of propofol-induced pain.

Indexed as

LidocaineOndansetronPropofolAdolescentAdultAgedAnesthetics, IntravenousAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodHumansInjections, IntravenousMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementYoung AdultAnesthetics, IntravenousAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineOndansetronPropofolInjection painLidocaineOndansetronPropofol

Identifiers

PMID35436859
PMCPMC9014613
OpenAlexW4225538083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.