Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436857›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2022

Measuring dose-related efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention: post hoc analysis of PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2.

Rami Apelian, Lee Boyle, Joe Hirman, Divya Asher

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02559895 phase3completednot on this map

A Parallel Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ALD403 Administered Intravenously in Patients With Frequent Episodic Migraines

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlder Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2015 to 2017Enrolled898ConditionsMigraine DisordersArmsALD403, Placebo
NCT02974153 phase3completednot on this map

A Parallel Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ALD403 Administered Intravenously in Patients With Chronic Migraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlder Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled1,121ConditionsMigraine DisordersArmsALD403 (Eptinezumab), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rami ApelianHuntington Headache and Neurology, 289 W. Huntington Drive, Suite 301, Arcadia, CA, 91007, USA. doctorapelian@huntingtonheadache.com.
Lee BoyleLundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA.
Joe HirmanPacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc., Woodinville, WA, USA.
Divya AsherLundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA.
Deerfield (United States) · USHuntington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEptinezumab 100 mg and 300 mg met the primary efficacy endpoint in both PROMISE clinical trials, significantly reducing frequency of monthly migraine days over Weeks 1‒12. The objective of this analysis was to assess the clinical response to eptinezumab 100 mg and 300 mg within the pivotal phase 3 PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2 studies to potentially identify subsets of patients with meaningful differences between doses.

methodsPatients from PROMISE-1 (NCT02559895) and PROMISE-2 (NCT02974153) trials were divided into subgroups based on demographic and migraine characteristics, and baseline questionnaire responses. For each subgroup, the overall likelihood of achieving ≥ 50% migraine responder rate (MRR) over Weeks 1-12 and Weeks 13-24 with either eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg was calculated using odds ratios (with associated confidence intervals) and compared.

resultsIn PROMISE-1 (episodic migraine) and PROMISE-2 (chronic migraine), the likelihood of achieving ≥ 50% MRR over Weeks 1-12 and Weeks 13-24 was roughly equivalent for patients receiving either dose level of eptinezumab. Given the number of comparisons performed, sporadic apparent differences were seen but no replicated patterns between studies emerged. In PROMISE-1, no differences were observed in any subgroup over Weeks 1-12. In PROMISE-2, patients reporting < 15 monthly migraine days at baseline, any problems with mobility per the EQ-5D-5L, or a social functioning score > 45.0 per the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), appeared more likely to achieve ≥ 50% MRR with 300 mg over Weeks 1-12, with none of these being apparent in PROMISE-1.

conclusionsOverall, these data suggest that across PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2, there were no meaningful differences in the likelihood of achieving ≥ 50% MRR between the eptinezumab dose levels in the majority of patient subgroups. In the few subgroups that displayed small, but potentially meaningful differences, patients were more likely to achieve ≥ 50% MRR with eptinezumab 300 mg; however, minimal consistency across both studies and time periods was noted.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. PROMISE-1: NCT02559895 . PROMISE-2: NCT02974153 .

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedMigraine DisordersDouble-Blind MethodHumansTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedeptinezumabDose responseEptinezumabMigrainePatient subgroups

Identifiers

PMID35436857
PMCPMC9014586
OpenAlexW4224112117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.