Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436697›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2022

Adolescents' and young adults' perceptions of risks and benefits differ by type of cannabis products.

Nhung Nguyen, Megan Wong, Kevin Delucchi, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Associations between Cannabis Consumption Methods and Cannabis Risk Perception.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Past-Year Blunt Smoking among Youth: Differences by LGBT and Non-LGBT Identity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nhung NguyenCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Megan WongReach Lab, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Kevin DelucchiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Bonnie Halpern-FelsherReach Lab, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States. Electronic address: Bonnie.HalpernFelsher@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Training and Education p489-500P50CA180890 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GLANTZ, STANTON ARNOLD · 2013 to 2018
$20.5M
PROJECT 5: IMPACT OF CHANGING TOBACCO PRODUCT USE ON HEALTHCARE COSTS FOR GENERAL AND VULNERABLE POPULATIONSU54HL147127 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2018 to 2022
$20.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180890NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL147127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCannabis use patterns among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) have changed recently, with increasing use of non-combustible cannabis products. Little is known about perceived risks or benefits related to non-combustible products (e.g., vaporized and edible cannabis). We examined whether AYAs' perceived risks and benefits differ across four cannabis products, and by use status.

methodsWe conducted a survey of 433 California AYAs (M

resultsParticipants perceived combustible cannabis and blunts conferred the greatest risk for short-term (bad cough, trouble catching breath) and long-term (lung disease, oral and lung cancer, and heart attack) health outcomes and short-term social risks (friends upset, getting into trouble). These products were also perceived to have greater short-term and long-term benefits (i.e., reducing mental health problems) than vaporized and edible cannabis. The most common perceived risks were "get into trouble" and "become addicted." The most common benefits were "feel high or buzzed" and "feel less anxious." Ever cannabis users perceived less risks and greater benefits related to cannabis use than never users.

conclusionsAYAs differentially perceived risks and benefits related to use of four cannabis products. Public health and education efforts should address both perceived and real risks and benefits of specific cannabis products to prevent cannabis use among AYAs.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorCannabisHallucinogensAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHallucinogensAdolescents and young adultsCannabisMarijuanaPerceptionSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID35436697
PMCPMC9240855
OpenAlexW4223654104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.