Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436527›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical epidemiology2023

The GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development.

Thomas Piggott, Miranda W Langendam, Elena Parmelli, Jan Adolfsson, Elie A Akl, David Armstrong, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Jan Brozek, Markus Follmann and 9 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Thomas PiggottDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Miranda W LangendamDepartment of Epidemiology, and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam of Public Health Research Instute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elena ParmelliEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy. Electronic address: Elena.PARMELLI@ec.europa.eu.
Jan AdolfssonSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Sweden & The Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elie A AklDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
David ArmstrongFarncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Hamilton, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia 2109.
Romina Brignardello-PetersenDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jan BrozekDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Markus FollmannGerman Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Ina KoppInstitute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies, (AWMF-IMWi), c/o Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Joerg J MeerpohlInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany.
Luciana NeamtiuEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Monika NothackerInstitute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies, (AWMF-IMWi), c/o Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Amir QaseemAmerican College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Paolo Giorgi RossiEpidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Zuleika Saz-ParkinsonEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Philip J van der WeesRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare and Department of Rehabilitation, The Netherlands.
Holger J SchünemannDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Hamilton, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: schuneh@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOur objective was to develop an extension of the widely used GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and Tool for the integration of quality assurance and improvement (QAI) schemes with guideline development.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods approach incorporating evidence from a systematic review, an expert workshop and a survey of experts to iteratively create an extension of the checklist for QAI through three rounds of feedback. As a part of this process, we also refined criteria of a good guideline-based quality indicator.

resultsWe developed a 40-item checklist extension addressing steps for the integration of QAI into guideline development across the existing 18 topics and created one new topic specific to QAI. The steps span from 'organization, budget, planning and training', to updating of QAI and guideline implementation.

conclusionThe tool supports integration of QAI schemes with guideline development initiatives and it will be used in the forthcoming integrated European Commission Initiative on Colorectal Cancer. Future work should evaluate this extension and QAI items requiring additional support for guideline developers and links to QAI schemes.

Indexed as

ChecklistGuidelines as TopicQuality ImprovementHumansChecklistGIN-McMaster ChecklistGRADEGuidelinesHealth decision-makingPerformance monitoringQuality assuranceQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID35436527
PMCPMC10109085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.