ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2022
Metabolomic Identification of a Novel, Externally Validated Predictive Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-metabolite microbiota-associated signature for early risk stratification of gestational diabetes mellitus.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Metabolomic Signature of Visceral Adiposity: Insights from a Population-Based Cohort.Metabolites · 2026Article
- 1,5-Anhydroglucitol: From Short-Term Glycemic Monitoring to Risk Stratification of Diabetes Complications.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Review
- The causal relationships between inflammatory cytokines, blood metabolites, and thyroid cancer: a two-step Mendelian randomization analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Identification and validation of palmitoylation-related biomarkers in gestational diabetes mellitus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancement in predictive biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis and related outcomes: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Article
- Social inequalities in pregnancy metabolic profile: findings from the multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Metabolic profiles in gestational diabetes mellitus can reveal novel biomarkers for prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Metabolomic Identification of a Novel, Externally Validated Predictive Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextUndiagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major preventable cause of stillbirth. In the United Kingdom, women are selected for diagnostic testing for GDM based on risk factors, including body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2.
objectiveTo improve the prediction of GDM using metabolomics.
methodsWe performed metabolomics on maternal serum from the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study at 12 and 20 weeks of gestational age (wkGA; 185 GDM cases and 314 noncases). Predictive metabolites were internally validated using the 28 wkGA POP study serum sample and externally validated using 24- to 28-wkGA fasting plasma from the Born in Bradford (BiB) cohort (349 GDM cases and 2347 noncases). The predictive ability of a model including the metabolites was compared with BMI > 30 kg/m2 in the POP study.
resultsForty-seven predictive metabolites were identified using the 12- and 20-wkGA samples. At 28 wkGA, 4 of these [mannose, 4-hydroxyglutamate, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, and lactosyl-N-palmitoyl-sphingosine (d18:1/16:0)] independently increased the bootstrapped area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) by >0.01. All 4 were externally validated in the BiB samples (P = 2.6 × 10-12, 2.2 × 10-13, 6.9 × 10-28, and 2.6 × 10-17, respectively). In the POP study, BMI > 30 kg/m2 had a sensitivity of 28.7% (95% CI 22.3-36.0%) and a specificity of 85.4% whereas at the same level of specificity, a predictive model using age, BMI, and the 4 metabolites had a sensitivity of 60.2% (95% CI 52.6-67.4%) and an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86).
conclusionsWe identified 4 strongly and independently predictive metabolites for GDM that could have clinical utility in screening for GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.