Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35436160›Full record

ArticleDisability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology2023

Wheelchair service provision education for healthcare professional students, healthcare personnel and educators across low- to high-resourced settings: a scoping review.

Yohali Burrola-Mendez, Sureshkumar Kamalakannan, Paula W Rushton, Selsabil-A Bouziane, Ed Giesbrecht, R Lee Kirby, Rosemary J Gowran, David F Rusaw, Tomasz Tasiemski, Mary Goldberg and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Yohali Burrola-MendezSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9357-7543
Sureshkumar KamalakannanDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4407-7838
Paula W RushtonSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-0477
Selsabil-A BouzianeSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Ed GiesbrechtDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8011-3491
R Lee KirbyDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-1209
Rosemary J GowranSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Health Research Institute, Health Implementation Science and Technology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8114-5815
David F RusawSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0220-6278
Tomasz TasiemskiDepartment of Adapted Physical Activity, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3038-3578
Mary GoldbergDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4922-9186
Marco TofaniDepartment of Intensive Neurorehabilitation and Robotics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2071-4513
Jessica P PedersenDepartment of Physical Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Jon PearlmanDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0830-9136
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · USBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITDalhousie University · CAInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru · INJönköping University · SENational University of Ireland, Maynooth · IENorthwestern University · USUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHE/16/1/502650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review aimed to collate and summarize available research literature about wheelchair service provision education available to healthcare professional students, healthcare personnel and educators across low- to high-resourced settings.

methodsThe Joanna Briggs Institute methodological steps for scoping reviews were followed. Included studies were mainly sourced from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Academic Search Complete and ProQuest. Independent title, abstract and full-text screening with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria was performed. All screening and extraction were performed independently by two authors. A thematic approach was used to synthesize results. Data extracted from included studies were charted according to a template that we created. The study quality was also appraised.

resultsA total of 25 articles were included (11, 36% from high-income settings) with 12 (48%) observational studies and 13 (52%) experimental studies. The literature addressed three main topics: (1) assessing wheelchair service provision knowledge, (2) implementing training interventions using in-person, online and/or hybrid learning approaches and (3) describing current wheelchair service provision education globally. The most frequently reported training programs used were the Wheelchair Skills Program and the World Health Organization Wheelchair Service Training Package - Basic Level.

conclusionLimited information has been published about the integration of wheelchair content into the curricula of professional rehabilitation programs. Efforts to build international partnerships, improve the quality and currency of training programs and build resources that can assist educators in the integration of wheelchair-related content into professional rehabilitation programs should be prioritized.Implications for RehabilitationThis is the first review that examined and synthesized the current state of wheelchair service provision education for rehabilitation students and personnel across low- to high-income countries.Findings from this review indicate that there is limited information about the integration of wheelchair-related content into professional rehabilitation programs.Efforts to build international partnerships, standardize wheelchair service provision content and evaluation and integrate training into professional rehabilitation programs worldwide should be prioritized.

Indexed as

LearningWheelchairsDelivery of Health CareHumansStudentsWorld Health OrganizationCourse developmentcourse integration educationrehabilitationscoping reviewtrainingwheelchair

Identifiers

PMID35436160
PMCPMC7614122
OpenAlexW4224231363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.