Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35435598›Full record

ReviewTranslational stroke research2022

Impact of Electronic Cigarette Vaping on Cerebral Ischemia: What We Know So Far.

Jonathan Siegel, Shahil H Patel, Berk Mankaliye, Ami P Raval

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Translational stroke research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electronic Cigarette Harms: Aggregate Evidence Shows Damage to Biological Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan Siegel *Peritz Scheinberg Cerebral Vascular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Neurology Research Building, 1420 NW 9th AvenueRoom # 203H, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Shahil H Patel *Peritz Scheinberg Cerebral Vascular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Neurology Research Building, 1420 NW 9th AvenueRoom # 203H, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Berk MankaliyePeritz Scheinberg Cerebral Vascular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Neurology Research Building, 1420 NW 9th AvenueRoom # 203H, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Ami P RavalPeritz Scheinberg Cerebral Vascular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Neurology Research Building, 1420 NW 9th AvenueRoom # 203H, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. ARaval@med.miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1757-9947
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are battery-powered nicotine delivery devices that have rapidly gained popularity and attention globally. ECs work by heating a liquid to produce an aerosol that usually contains nicotine, flavoring compounds, and other chemicals, which are inhaled during vaping. EC aerosols are depicted to contain a lower number and overall quantity of harmful toxicants than conventional cigarettes (CCs). However, emerging research indicates that EC aerosols contain harmful ingredients including ultrafine particles, volatile organic compounds, and heavy metals. One common ingredient found in both CCs and ECs is nicotine, which has been shown to be both highly addictive and toxic. Particularly relevant to our current review, there is an enormous amount of literature that shows that smoking-derived nicotine exacerbates ischemic brain damage. Therefore, the question arises: will EC use impact the outcome of stroke? ECs are highly popular and relatively new in the market; thus, our understanding about the long-term effects of EC use on brain are lacking. The current review strives to extrapolate the existing understanding of the nicotine-induced effects of conventional smoking on the brain to the possible effects that ECs may have on the brain, which may ultimately have a potential for adverse stroke risk or severity.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsStrokeVapingAerosolsHumansNicotineAerosolsNicotineBlood–brain barrierCerebral blood flowEndothelial cellsMetabolismNicotineSex difference

Identifiers

PMID35435598
OpenAlexW4224002034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.