ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022
Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: State of the Art.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06218485 (Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy Versus Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stent Implantation After Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve-based Decision-Making), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy Versus Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stent Implantation After Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve-based Decision-Making (The FLAVOUR III Trial)
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Angiography-derived versus pressure-wire-based physiological assessment to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Three-Year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2024Trial
- Validation of angiography-based FFR in non-culprit vessels of patients presenting with STEMI.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- VERMONT μQFR: Diagnostic Accuracy of Murray Law-Based 2D-μQFR Compared to 3D-μQFR and vFFR.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) vs. optical coherence tomography in chronic coronary syndromes (VISION-FFR).Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- VERMONT non-optimised: Feasibility of angiography-derived vFFR using baseline diagnostic catheter images.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- VERMONT: Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Assessment of Stenosis Severity: A Prospective Study.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Toward quantitative X-ray elastography of coronary arteries using flexural pulse waves.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence based fractional flow reserve.Cardiology journal · 2025Review
- Coronary Artery Tree Description and Lesion Evaluation (CatLet) score for functional evaluation of coronary stenosis: a comparison study with pressure wire fractional flow reserve.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Moderate Lesions in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome.The journal of Tehran Heart Center · 2024Article
- After RIPCORD 2, FAME 3, FLOWER-MI and FUTURE: Has the Pressure Wire had its Day?Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2024Review
- The functional impact on donor vessel following transcatheter closure of coronary artery fistulas-a retrospective study using QFR analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Study design and rationale of the angio-based final functional effect of PCI (AFFE PCI) study: a prospective multi-center study of post-PCI vFFR impact on clinical outcomes and residual angina.Cardiology journal · 2024Article
- Coronary Angiography Upgraded by Imaging Post-Processing: Present and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Multimodality OCT, IVUS and FFR evaluation of coronary intermediate grade lesions in women vs. men.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Angiography-derived physiology versus pressure wire-based fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularization guidance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThree-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography-based methods of fractional flow reserve (FFR) derivation have emerged as an appealing alternative to conventional pressure-wire-based physiological lesion assessment and have the potential to further extend the use of physiology in general. Here, we summarize the current evidence related to angiography-based FFR and perspectives on future developments. RECENT
findingsGrowing evidence suggests good diagnostic performance of angiography-based FFR measurements, both in chronic and acute coronary syndromes, as well as in specific lesion subsets, such as long and calcified lesions, left main coronary stenosis, and bifurcations. More recently, promising results on the superiority of angiography-based FFR as compared to angiography-guided PCI have been published. Currently available angiography -FFR indices proved to be an excellent alternative to invasive pressure wire-based FFR. Dedicated prospective outcome data comparing these indices to routine guideline recommended PCI including the use of FFR are eagerly awaited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.