Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35435498›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

Preoperative risk stratification of permanent stoma in patients with non-metastatic mid and low rectal cancer undergoing curative resection and a temporary stoma.

Shu-Huan Huang, Kun-Yu Tsai, Tzong-Yun Tsai, Jeng-Fu You, Chien-Yuh Yeh, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Reiping Tang, Jy-Ming Chiang, Wen-Sy Tsai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shu-Huan HuangDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2673-9850
Kun-Yu TsaiDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1856-9663
Tzong-Yun TsaiDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1498-937X
Jeng-Fu YouDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5748-1659
Chien-Yuh YehDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.
Pao-Shiu HsiehDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.
Reiping TangDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.
Jy-Ming ChiangDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3700-3195
Wen-Sy TsaiDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan. wensyt@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6873-2863
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University of Science and Technology · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough a temporary stoma can mitigate the severity of anastomotic leakage, some rectal cancer patients retain a permanent stoma after sphincter-preserving surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to identify independent preoperative risk factors for permanent stoma and establish a prediction model for mid-and low-rectal cancer patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery and temporary stoma.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2000 and 2015. The risk factors for permanent stomas were collected and analyzed.

resultsA total of 1020 rectal cancer patients with temporary stoma were included. The overall rate of permanent stoma was 17.5% (n = 179). Cancer progression and anastomotic complications are major causes of permanent stomas. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative risk factors such as advanced age, male sex, preoperative CEA ≥ 10 ng/ml, T4 stage, N stage, low rectal tumor, and ASA ≥ III were independent preoperative risk factors after adjustment. The ROC curve of the risk factors and permanent stoma showed an AUC of 0.689, a cut-off value of 2.5, a sensitivity of 0.689, and a specificity of 0.622. The permanent stoma rates were significantly higher between risk scores ≤ 2 and > 2 (29.9% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001).

conclusionPreoperative CEA ≥ 10 ng/ml, T4 stage, N stage, low rectal tumor, advanced age, ASA ≥ III, and male sex were independent preoperative prognostic factors for a permanent stoma. The risk was higher with a score greater than two. Therefore, the risk of subsequent permanent stoma should be evaluated and informed to the patient prior to the primary surgery.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsSurgical StomasAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsPermanent stomaRectal cancerRisk stratificationSphincter-preserving surgery

Identifiers

PMID35435498
OpenAlexW4224060948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.