SynthesisDysphagia2022
A Systematic Review of Swallowing Training Measures for Postoperative Oral Cancer Patients.
Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Rehabilitation Interventions on Trismus in Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Oral diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Management of dysphagia in head and neck cancer: current and future perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Factors influencing delayed referral of oral cancer patients from family dentists to the core hospital.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Swallowing disorder is one of the most common postoperative complications for oral cancer patients and seriously influences quality of life. Limited attention has been paid to evaluating swallowing training measures in postoperative oral cancer patients. This study systematically reviewed swallowing training measures for these patients. A comprehensive search strategy was undertaken across various databases for studies published between database inception and 15 June 2021. Raters independently judged titles, abstracts and full articles for selection according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included literature was evaluated for quality and data were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3. Ten intervention studies (four randomized controlled trials and six quasi-experimental studies) involving 588 patients were identified. Across the studies, most started in the early postoperative stage; however, there were differences in starting time, training time and duration, and type of training. We summarized four training methods: oral exercise, oral sensory stimulation, compensatory strategies and protective airway manoeuvres. The meta-analysis indicated that swallowing training could improve patients' swallowing function and quality of life in the short term, but the long-term effects were not obvious. Swallowing training mostly occurred in the early postoperative period and training measures were often used in combination. The timing, frequency and content of interventions varied between studies, and the effectiveness of any single measure was unclear. High-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to study the efficacy and clinical applicability of various training measures, to provide a theoretical basis for their optimal selection and to develop a standardized training programme for postoperative oral cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.