Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35435465›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2022

A longitudinal study on the interchangeable use of whole-body and local exercise thresholds in cycling.

Kevin Caen, Jan G Bourgois, Eva Stassijns, Jan Boone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin CaenDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan G BourgoisDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Eva StassijnsDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan BooneDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Jan.Boone@UGent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8485-6169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study longitudinally examined the interchangeable use of critical power (CP), the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) and the respiratory compensation point (RCP) (i.e., whole-body thresholds), and breakpoints in muscle deoxygenation (m[HHb]

methodsTwenty-one participants were tested on two timepoints (T1 and T2) with a 4-week period (study 1: 10 women, age = 27 ± 3 years, [Formula: see text] = 43.2 ± 7.3 mL min

resultsNone of the thresholds were significantly different in study 1 ([Formula: see text]: P = 0.143, PO: P = 0.281), but differences between whole-body and local thresholds were observed in study 2 ([Formula: see text]: P < 0.001, PO: P = 0.024). Whole-body thresholds showed better 4-week test-retest reliability (TEM = 88-125 mL min

conclusionWhole-body thresholds (CP/MLSS/RCP) showed a close and consistent coherence taking into account a 3-6%-bandwidth of typical variation. In contrast, local thresholds (m[HHb]

Indexed as

Exercise TestOxygen ConsumptionAdultBicyclingFemaleHumansLactic AcidLongitudinal StudiesMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultLactic AcidCritical powerDeoxygenation thresholdEMG thresholdMaximal lactate steady stateRespiratory compensation point

Identifiers

PMID35435465
PMCPMC9014408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.