ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2022
Comparison of glucose time in range and area under curve in range in relation to risk of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes patients.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum 1,5-Anhydroglucitol Identifies Residual Mortality Risk Beyond Time in Range in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study.Journal of diabetes · 2026Article
- Can continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycemic variability predict retinal neurodegeneration earlier than HbA1c in patients without clinically apparent retinopathy?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Association between islet β-cell function and time in range in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Article
- Association between time in tight range and incident diabetic retinopathy in adults with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring compared with blood glucose monitoring is associated with lower HbADiabetologia · 2025Article
- Current landscape and comprehensive management of glycemic variability in diabetic retinopathy.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Glycaemia risk index uncovers distinct glycaemic variability patterns associated with remission status in type 1 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2024Article
- Increased Derived Time in Range Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Severe Hypoglycemia, and Microvascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of DEVOTE.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2023Article
- Recent updates in factors associated with incidence and screening of diabetic eye disease.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIMS/
introductionWe proposed a novel continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based metric, area under the curve in range (AucIR), for integrating both the amplitude and duration of dysglycemia, and further compared AucIR with the emerging key CGM-derived metric, time in range (TIR). MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 2,030 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled during May 2020 to October 2021. AucIR and TIR were measured with 7-day CGM data. Logistic regression analysis and the C-statistic was carried out to assess the association of AucIR and TIR with diabetic retinopathy (DR).
resultsBoth AucIR (r = -0.89) and TIR (r = -0.95) were strongly correlated with mean glucose levels. Compared with TIR, AucIR showed a tighter relationship with parameters of glycemic variability, including the coefficient of variation (r = -0.56), standard deviation (r = -0.89) and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (r = -0.70). For each absolute 10% decrease in AucIR, the risk of DR was increased by 7% (95% confidence interval 1.02-1.13) after adjustment for confounders. With respect to TIR, each absolute 10% decrease was associated with an 8% (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.14) increased risk of DR. The model discrimination for DR, as measured by C-statistic, did not differ significantly between the two metrics (P > 0.05).
conclusionsAucIR did not provide added benefit over TIR in the assessment of DR risk among patients with type 2 diabetes. The potential value of AucIR needs to be explored in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.