Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35435302›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2022

Complex regional pain syndrome what is the outcome? - a systematic review of the course and impact of CRPS at 12 months from symptom onset and beyond.

Selina Johnson, Fiona Cowell, Sharon Gillespie, Andreas Goebel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pain (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Selina JohnsonWalton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8788-4512
Fiona CowellLiverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust (LUHFT), Liverpool, UK.
Sharon GillespieLiverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust (LUHFT), Liverpool, UK.
Andreas GoebelWalton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3763-8206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveTo improve CRPS treatment, it is imperative to understand the nature, degree and relative importance of ongoing problems associated with CRPS. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the published data concerning measures of function and impact including occupational parameters, of CRPS at 12 months from symptom onset and beyond. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: MEDLINE, EmBase and PsychINFO were searched (inception to May 2021). Study cohorts were eligible if they included; adult patients with the primary complaint of CRPS ≥12 months duration, outcomes that reported change in CRPS signs and symptoms, and physical and social function. Prospero registration: CRD42021241785.

resultsTwenty-two included studies suggest that pain and motor dysfunction are the most dominant long-term features of CRPS, persisting for 51%-89% of patients at ≥12 months. On average for all patients who had CRPS at baseline, grip strength was found to be reduced by 25%-66%, and range of motion reduced by 20%-25% at ≥12 months. Such losses were associated with physical and social disability. Thirty to forty percent of all patients did not return to work and a further 27%-35% of persons returned to work but required some form of workplace adaptation, although the quality of this data was poor. Quality assessment highlighted limitations in the literature, such as high attrition bias and variations in diagnostic criteria.

conclusionsResults provide first-time quantitative data including specific evidence about losses to motor function and long-term compromises to work status. Results demonstrate that the ongoing impact of one episode of CRPS on limb function and work status is relatively high. SIGNIFICANCE: This review provides first-time clarity in relation to outcomes of limb function and work status associated with an episode of CRPS, beyond 12 months from onset. Results demonstrate that the long-term impact of an episode of CRPS on these outcomes is much larger than previously described, and thus also illustrates how the wider health economic impact of CRPS is not yet fully understood. We additionally highlight the need for future research that identifies long-term predictors, and treatments that can foster good functional and occupational recovery.

Indexed as

Complex Regional Pain SyndromesPersons with DisabilitiesAdultExtremitiesHumansPainPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID35435302
PMCPMC9324966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.