ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Hybrid data fidelity term approach for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensitivity of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in Deep Gray Matter.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Toward a realistic in silico abdominal phantom for QSM.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Hybrid data fidelity term approach for quantitative susceptibility mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- QSM reconstruction challenge 2.0: Design and report of results.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSusceptibility maps are usually derived from local magnetic field estimations by minimizing a functional composed of a data consistency term and a regularization term. The data-consistency term measures the difference between the desired solution and the measured data using typically the L2-norm. It has been proposed to replace this L2-norm with the L1-norm, due to its robustness to outliers and reduction of streaking artifacts arising from highly noisy or strongly perturbed regions. However, in regions with high SNR, the L1-norm yields a suboptimal denoising performance. In this work, we present a hybrid data fidelity approach that uses the L1-norm and subsequently the L2-norm to exploit the strengths of both norms.
methodsWe developed a hybrid data fidelity term approach for QSM (HD-QSM) based on linear susceptibility inversion methods, with total variation regularization. Each functional is solved with ADMM. The HD-QSM approach is a two-stage method that first finds a fast solution of the L1-norm functional and then uses this solution to initialize the L2-norm functional. In both norms we included spatially variable weights that improve the quality of the reconstructions.
resultsThe HD-QSM approach produced good quantitative reconstructions in terms of structural definition, noise reduction, and avoiding streaking artifacts comparable with nonlinear methods, but with higher computational efficiency. Reconstructions performed with this method achieved first place at the lowest RMS error category in stage 1 of the 2019 QSM Reconstruction Challenge.
conclusionsThe proposed method allows robust and accurate QSM reconstructions, obtaining superior performance to state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.