Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35435052›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Willingness to use and distribute HIV self-test kits to clients and partners: A qualitative analysis of female sex workers' collective opinion and attitude in Côte d'Ivoire, Mali, and Senegal.

Odette Ky-Zerbo, Alice Desclaux, Sokhna Boye, Anthony Vautier, Nicolas Rouveau, Brou Alexis Kouadio, Arlette Simo Fotso, Dolorès Pourette, Mathieu Maheu-Giroux, Souleymane Sow and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Odette Ky-ZerboTransVIHMI, IRD, Université de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-1580
Alice DesclauxTransVIHMI, IRD, Université de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
Sokhna BoyeCEPED, IRD, Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
Anthony VautierSolidarité Thérapeutique et Initiatives pour la Santé (Solthis), Dakar, Sénégal.ORCID 0000-0001-8039-6479
Nicolas RouveauCEPED, IRD, Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
Brou Alexis KouadioCEPED, IRD, Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
Arlette Simo FotsoCEPED, IRD, Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
Dolorès PouretteCEPED, IRD, Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
Mathieu Maheu-GirouxDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Souleymane SowCentre Régional de Recherche et de Formation à la Prise en Charge Clinique de Fann (CRCF), Dakar, Sénégal.
Cheick Sidi CamaraInstitut Malien de Recherche en Sciences Sociales (IMRSS), Bamako, Mali.
Clémence Doumenc-AïdaraSolidarité Thérapeutique et Initiatives pour la Santé (Solthis), Dakar, Sénégal.
Abdelaye KeitaInstitut National de Recherche en Santé Publique (INRSP), Bamako, Mali.
Marie Claude BoilyMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Romain SilholMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Marc d'ElbéeDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Anne BekelynckProgramme PAC-CI, ANRS Research Site, Treichville University Hospital, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Papa Alioune GueyeSolidarité Thérapeutique et Initiatives pour la Santé (Solthis), Dakar, Sénégal.ORCID 0000-0003-0592-1004
Papa Moussa DiopSolidarité Thérapeutique et Initiatives pour la Santé (Solthis), Dakar, Sénégal.
Olivier GeoffroySolidarité Thérapeutique et Initiatives pour la Santé (Solthis), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Odé Kanku KamembaSolidarité Thérapeutique et Initiatives pour la Santé (Solthis), Bamako, Mali.
Sanata DialloSolidarité Thérapeutique et Initiatives pour la Santé (Solthis), Dakar, Sénégal.
Eboi EhuiProgramme National de Lutte contre le Sida (PNLS), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Cheick Tidiane NdourDivision de Lutte contre le Sida et les IST, Ministère de la Santé et de l'Action Sociale, Institut d'Hygiène Sociale, Dakar, Sénégal.
Joseph LarmarangeCEPED, IRD, Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7097-700X
ATLAS team
Inserm · FRPour la Solidarité · BEImperial College London · GBInstitut National de Recherche en Santé Publique · MLCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique · MQComité National de Lutte contre le SIDA · CMLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMcGill University · CAProgramme PAC-CI · CI

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn West Africa, female sex workers are at increased risk of HIV acquisition and transmission. HIV self-testing could be an effective tool to improve access to and frequency of HIV testing to female sex workers, their clients and partners. This article explores their perceptions regarding HIV self-testing use and the redistribution of HIV self-testing kits to their partners and clients.

methodsEmbedded within ATLAS, a qualitative study was conducted in Côte-d'Ivoire, Mali, and Senegal in 2020. Nine focus group discussions were conducted. A thematic analysis was performed.

resultsA total of 87 participants expressed both positive attitudes toward HIV self-testing and their willingness to use or reuse HIV self-testing. HIV self-testing was perceived to be discreet, confidential, and convenient. HIV self-testing provides autonomy from testing by providers and reduces stigma. Some perceived HIV self-testing as a valuable tool for testing their clients who are willing to offer a premium for condomless sex. While highlighting some potential issues, overall, female sex workers were optimistic about linkage to confirmatory testing following a reactive HIV self-testing. Female sex workers expressed positive attitudes toward secondary distribution to their partners and clients, although it depended on relationship types. They seemed more enthusiastic about secondary distribution to their regular/emotional partners and regular clients with whom they had difficulty using condoms, and whom they knew enough to discuss HIV self-testing. However, they expressed that it could be more difficult with casual clients; the duration of the interaction being too short to discuss HIV self-testing, and they fear violence and/or losing them.

conclusionOverall, female sex workers have positive attitudes toward HIV self-testing use and are willing to redistribute to their regular partners and clients. However, they are reluctant to promote such use with their casual clients. HIV self-testing can improve access to HIV testing for female sex workers and the members of their sexual and social network.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSex WorkersAttitudeCote d'IvoireFemaleHumansMaliSelf-TestingSenegalATLASfemale sex workersHIV self-testingpartnersperceptionsecondary distributionWest Africa

Identifiers

PMID35435052
PMCPMC9021389
OpenAlexW4224326632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.