Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35435047›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of toxicology

Exploring the Definition of "Similar Toxicities": Case Studies Illustrating Industry and Regulatory Interpretation of ICH S6(R1) for Long-Term Toxicity Studies in One or Two Species.

Helen Prior, David O Clarke, David Jones, Eleni Salicru, Melissa M Schutten, Fiona Sewell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of toxicology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen Prior85272National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8700-7226
David O Clarke464876Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, USA.
David Jones9059Medicines Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK.
Eleni Salicru4137Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, ML, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-0824
Melissa M Schutten7412Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CF, USA.
Fiona Sewell85272National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5589-9453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ICH S6 (R1) states that safety evaluation of biotherapeutics should normally include 2 relevant species when available (i.e., a rodent and non-rodent species in which the test material is pharmacologically active), at least for short-term toxicology studies (generally supporting Phase I trials). For subsequent long-term toxicology studies (e.g., chronic studies up to 6 months dosing duration), there are options to reduce to only one species when justified, including when the mechanism of action of the biologic is well-understood or the toxicity findings in the short-term studies are "similar" in both the rodent and non-rodent species. Across the industry, around 25 to 33% of biologics assess multiple species within short-term toxicity studies but it is often unclear how different companies and regulators are applying the ICH S6 (R1) principles of "similar toxicity profiles" to progress with either 1 or 2 species in the long-term studies, in particular whether the absence of toxicities is considered within this definition. Sponsors may potentially continue to use 2 species to avoid regulatory risk and potential delays in development timelines, representing missed opportunities for reducing animal use, particularly of non-human primates, during drug development.This article summarizes presentations from a symposium at the 41

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentAnimalsHumansUnited StatesbiologicsICH S6(R1)long-term studiesnon-rodentrodent

Identifiers

PMID35435047
PMCPMC9152593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.