ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Need for Better and Broader Training in Cardio-Obstetrics: A National Survey of Cardiologists, Cardiovascular Team Members, and Cardiology Fellows in Training.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of pregnancy in women with rare multisystemic vascular diseases: a qualitative survey analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Cardio-Obstetrics Fundamentals for Fellows: A Digital Solution for Democratizing Cardio-Obstetric Education.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Creating a Cardio-Obstetrics Elective as a Fellow in Training.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Contraception Use in Adolescents and Young Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Fellow in Training Women's Heart Health Track: A Roadmap.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Cardio-Obstetrics Practice in Latin America: A Regional Survey of General Cardiologists.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Pregnancy-related cardiac outcomes among patients with congenital heart disease after formalization of a cardio-obstetrics program.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2024Article
- How do residents respond to uncertainty with peers and supervisors in multidisciplinary teams? Insights from simulations with epistemic fidelity.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- Peripartum HFpEF: Identification of a Novel Phenotype and the Need for Cardio-Obstetrics Management.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Cardio-Obstetrics: A Critical, Growing Subspecialty.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Article
- Cardio-Obstetrics: A Blueprint for Improving Maternal Cardiovascular Health Across the Life Course.JACC. Case reports · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Fellowship Training in Cardio-Obstetrics: JACC Review Topic of the Week.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Reproductive Experiences and Cardiovascular Disease Care in Pregnancy-Capable and Postmenopausal Individuals: Insights From the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry.Current problems in cardiology · 2023Review
- Cardio-Obstetrics: Moving Beyond Programming to Action.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- A blueprint for a new model of sexual and reproductive health care in subspecialty medicine.Health services research · 2023Article
- Early identification and treatment of women's cardiovascular risk factors prevents cardiovascular disease, saves lives, and protects future generations: Policy recommendations and take action plan utilizing policy levers.Clinical cardiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Team-based models of cardio-obstetrics care have been developed to address the increasing rate of maternal mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular clinician and trainee knowledge and comfort with this topic, and the extent of implementation of an interdisciplinary approach to cardio-obstetrics, are unknown. Methods and Results We aimed to assess the current state of cardio-obstetrics knowledge, practices, and services provided by US cardiovascular clinicians and trainees. A survey developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology was circulated to a representative sample of cardiologists (N=311), cardiovascular team members (N=51), and fellows in training (N=139) from June 18, 2020, to July 29, 2020. Knowledge and attitudes about the provision of cardiovascular care to pregnant patients and the prevalence and composition of cardio-obstetrics teams were assessed. The widest knowledge gaps on the care of pregnant compared with nonpregnant patients were reported for medication safety (42%), acute coronary syndromes (39%), aortopathies (40%), and valvular heart disease (30%). Most respondents (76%) lack access to a dedicated cardio-obstetrics team, and only 29% of practicing cardiologists received cardio-obstetrics didactics during training. One third of fellows in training reported seeing pregnant women 0 to 1 time per year, and 12% of fellows in training report formal training in cardio-obstetrics. Conclusions Formalized training in cardio-obstetrics is uncommon, and limited access to multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics teams and large knowledge gaps exist among cardiovascular clinicians. Augmentation of cardio-obstetrics education across career stages is needed to reduce these deficits. These survey results are an initial step toward developing a standard expectation for clinicians' training in cardio-obstetrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.