Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35435011›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Need for Better and Broader Training in Cardio-Obstetrics: A National Survey of Cardiologists, Cardiovascular Team Members, and Cardiology Fellows in Training.

Natalie A Bello, Akanksha Agrawal, Melinda B Davis, Colleen M Harrington, Kathryn J Lindley, Margo B Minissian, Garima Sharma, Mary Norine Walsh, Ki Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cardio-Obstetrics: A Critical, Growing Subspecialty.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Cardio-Obstetrics: Moving Beyond Programming to Action.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natalie A BelloDepartment of Cardiology Smidt Heart Institute Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA.ORCID 0000-0003-3257-3623
Akanksha AgrawalEmory Heart and Vascular Center Emory Women's Heart Center Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA.
Melinda B DavisDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI.ORCID 0000-0002-3676-1982
Colleen M HarringtonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Medicine University of Massachusetts School of Medicine Worcester MA.ORCID 0000-0002-2830-9953
Kathryn J LindleyCardiovascular Division Department of Medicine Washington University in St Louis MO.ORCID 0000-0002-8504-0006
Margo B MinissianBarbra Streisand Women's Heart Center Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute and the Geri and Richard Brawerman Nursing Institute Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA.
Garima SharmaCiccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0001-7254-2077
Mary Norine WalshDivision of Cardiology St. Vincent Heart Center Indianapolis IN.
Ki ParkDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville FL.

Funding

Cardiac Manifestations of PreeclampsiaR01HL153382 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BELLO, NATALIE A · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
Blood Pressure Measurement and Hypertension in PregnancyK23HL136853 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BELLO, NATALIE A · 2018 to 2022
$948k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL136853NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Team-based models of cardio-obstetrics care have been developed to address the increasing rate of maternal mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular clinician and trainee knowledge and comfort with this topic, and the extent of implementation of an interdisciplinary approach to cardio-obstetrics, are unknown. Methods and Results We aimed to assess the current state of cardio-obstetrics knowledge, practices, and services provided by US cardiovascular clinicians and trainees. A survey developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology was circulated to a representative sample of cardiologists (N=311), cardiovascular team members (N=51), and fellows in training (N=139) from June 18, 2020, to July 29, 2020. Knowledge and attitudes about the provision of cardiovascular care to pregnant patients and the prevalence and composition of cardio-obstetrics teams were assessed. The widest knowledge gaps on the care of pregnant compared with nonpregnant patients were reported for medication safety (42%), acute coronary syndromes (39%), aortopathies (40%), and valvular heart disease (30%). Most respondents (76%) lack access to a dedicated cardio-obstetrics team, and only 29% of practicing cardiologists received cardio-obstetrics didactics during training. One third of fellows in training reported seeing pregnant women 0 to 1 time per year, and 12% of fellows in training report formal training in cardio-obstetrics. Conclusions Formalized training in cardio-obstetrics is uncommon, and limited access to multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics teams and large knowledge gaps exist among cardiovascular clinicians. Augmentation of cardio-obstetrics education across career stages is needed to reduce these deficits. These survey results are an initial step toward developing a standard expectation for clinicians' training in cardio-obstetrics.

Indexed as

CardiologistsCardiologyCardiovascular DiseasesObstetricsFemaleHumansMaternal MortalityPregnancyUnited Statescardio‐obstetricscontinuing medical educationmedical knowledgepregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35435011
PMCPMC9238459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.