Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434962›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2022

Progression-free survival at 3 years is a reliable surrogate for 5-year overall survival for patients suffering from locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Yu-Xian Yang, Yu-Zhen Zheng, Tian-Tian Gao, Shi-Liang Liu, Mian Xi, Meng-Zhong Liu, Jun-Ye Wang, Shu-Nan Qi, Yong Yang, Lei Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Xian YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yu-Zhen ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Tian-Tian GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shi-Liang LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Mian XiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Meng-Zhong LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jun-Ye WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shu-Nan QiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, CAMS and PUMC, National Institute of Biological Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yong YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4241-9972
Lei ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-9189
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite 3-year survival being used as a primary endpoint in some randomized controlled trials (RCTs), limited evidence supports the use of intermediate endpoints to evaluate the effect of new therapies in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). This study aimed to systematically evaluate progression-free survival at 3 years (3-year PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with ESCC.

methodsWe identified 528 patients newly diagnosed with locally advanced ESCC who received definitive radiotherapy. OS was compared with an age- and sex-matched general Chinese population using the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). Regression analysis was used to validate the correlation between PFS and OS using published data.

resultsThe annual risk of progression decreased to 11.5% after 3 years. Patients who did not achieve 3-year PFS had a median postprogression survival (PPS) of 7.3 months, with a 5-year OS rate of 9.6% and a SMR of 15.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.9-17.5). Conversely, the SMR for patients who achieved 3-year PFS was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.3). We observed a significant correlation between log hazard ratio (HR) (PFS) and log HR (OS) at the trial level (r = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.88-0.90). The strongest correlation was observed between 3-year PFS and 5-year OS in RCTs and retrospective studies.

conclusionsPatients exhibiting progression within 3 years experienced poor survival, whereas patients achieving 3-year PFS had excellent outcomes. Our study supports 3-year PFS as a reliable primary endpoint for study design and risk stratification in locally advanced ESCC.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaHumansProgression-Free SurvivalProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival Rateesophageal squamous cell carcinomaoverall survivalprogression-free survival at 3 years

Identifiers

PMID35434962
PMCPMC9582670
OpenAlexW4224039515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.