Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434805›Full record

ReviewJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2022

Experimental techniques and terminology in gas-phase ion spectroscopy.

Aleksandr Pereverzev, Jana Roithová

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Analytical applications of gas-phase ion chemistry enabled by mass spectrometry.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleksandr PereverzevInstitute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5486-6916
Jana RoithováInstitute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0688

Funding

The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 740.018.022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective gives an overview of the action spectroscopy methods for measurements of electronic, vibrational, and rotational spectra of mass-selected ions in the gas phase. We classify and give a short overview of the existing experimental approaches in this field. There is currently a plethora of names used for, essentially, the same techniques. Hence within this overview, we scrutinized the notations and suggested terms to be generally used. The selection was either driven by making the name unique and straightforward or the term being the most broadly used one. We believe that a simplification and a unification of the notation in ion spectroscopy can make this field better accessible for experts outside the mass spectrometry community where the applications of gas-phase action ion spectroscopy can make a large impact.

Indexed as

IonsMass SpectrometrySpectrum AnalysisIonsaction spectroscopyion spectroscopyIRMPDLIICGLIRluminescencemass spectrometryphotodissociationtagging

Identifiers

PMID35434805
PMCPMC9285946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.