Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434703›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oral health2022

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Sugar-Free Chewing Gum on Plaque Quantity in the Oral Cavity.

Melanie Nasseripour, Jonathon Timothy Newton, Fiona Warburton, Oluwatunmise Awojobi, Sonya Di Giorgio, Jennifer Elizabeth Gallagher, Avijit Banerjee

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effect of xylitol chewing gums and candies on caries occurrence in children: a systematic review with special reference to caries level at study baseline.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Beneficial Effects of Xylitol Chewing Gum and Candies on Oral Health in Older People and Individuals With Disabilities: A Systematic Review.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie NasseripourCentre for Dental Education, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Dental Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathon Timothy NewtonFaculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Dental Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona WarburtonFaculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Dental Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Oluwatunmise AwojobiFaculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Dental Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sonya Di GiorgioFaculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Dental Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer Elizabeth GallagherFaculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Dental Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Avijit BanerjeeFaculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Dental Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this systematic review of published literature was to answer the research question, "What is the difference in the level of plaque quantity, in adults and children who chew sugar-free gum (SFG), compared with those who do not chew SFG, who do not chew gum, or who use alternatives such as probiotics or fluoride varnish?". Methods: The systematic review [registered on PROSPERO 2018 (CRD42018094676)] included studies on adults and children with chewing of SFG as the main intervention, where "sugar" referred to monosaccharides and disaccharides. Included studies were in English and corresponded to primary research published between 1946 and 2020. The search conducted spanned all relevant databases using both Medical Subject Headings (MESH) and free text with combinations of "chewing gum," "sugar-free," "caries," "xerostomia," "periodontal disease." Results: Eight articles included plaque quantity as part of their outcomes. Meta-analysis showed that SFG significantly reduced plaque quantity (effect size-0.778; 95% CI-1.167 to-0.39). The correlation between the baseline and the end of study data was assumed to be 0.95 for the control and 0.65 for the SFG group. A sensitivity analysis was conducted with the pre- to post-test correlation, set at 0.95 for the SFG group. This gave an effect size of-1.098 (95% CI-1.539 to-0.656) with Conclusion: There is some evidence that chewing sugar-free gum, in particular xylitol SFG, reduces the quantity of plaque in the oral cavity in comparison to non SFG chewing or no chewing controls. Further research with improved design, lengthier timeframes and higher number of participants should be considered. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=94676.

Indexed as

adultschildrenclinical trialsplaquepolyolspreventionsugar-free gumxylitol

Identifiers

PMID35434703
PMCPMC9006880
OpenAlexW4221135076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.