Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434684›Full record

ReviewEJVES vascular forum2022

A Narrative Review of Experimental Models to Study Vascular Grafts Infections.

Mathilde Puges, Fatima M'Zali, Sabine Pereyre, Cécile Bébéar, Charles Cazanave, Xavier Bérard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJVES vascular forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial Neutrophils Against Vascular Graft Infection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathilde PugesCHU de Bordeaux, Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, Bordeaux, France.
Fatima M'ZaliUniversity of Bordeaux, UMR 5234 CNRS, Microbiologie Fondamentale et Pathogénicité, Aquitaine Microbiologie, Bordeaux, France.
Sabine PereyreUniversity of Bordeaux, UMR 5234 CNRS, Microbiologie Fondamentale et Pathogénicité, Antimicrobial Resistance in Mycoplasmas and Gram-Negative Bacteria, Bordeaux, France.
Cécile BébéarUniversity of Bordeaux, UMR 5234 CNRS, Microbiologie Fondamentale et Pathogénicité, Antimicrobial Resistance in Mycoplasmas and Gram-Negative Bacteria, Bordeaux, France.
Charles CazanaveCHU de Bordeaux, Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, Bordeaux, France.
Xavier BérardCHU de Bordeaux, Vascular Surgery Department, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many experimental models have been developed to decipher the mechanisms of vascular graft and endograft infections (VGEIs), and to elaborate strategies to prevent or treat their occurrence. A systematic literature research was conducted to identify the most accurate models for studying VGEIs, depending on the research question. Methods: A narrative literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases, with no set limit on the date of publication, up to 10 August 2021. Results: A total of 243 studies were included in the review after reading the full length articles: 55 Conclusion: Despite protocol discrepancies, it was possible to dinstinguish three main experimental models (i.e., in vitro and in vivo vascular models, and extravascular models), which all remain of interest to study specific phases of VGEIs.

Indexed as

Animal modelBiofilmIn vitro modelReviewVascular graft and endograft infections

Identifiers

PMID35434684
PMCPMC9006669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.