Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434643›Full record

ArticleSN social sciences2022

Monitoring event-driven dynamics on Twitter: a case study in Belarus.

Natalie M Rice, Benjamin D Horne, Catherine A Luther, Joshua D Borycz, Suzie L Allard, Damian J Ruck, Michael Fitzgerald, Oleg Manaev, Brandon C Prins, Maureen Taylor and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SN social sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natalie M RiceCenter for Information and Communication Studies, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3118-0302
Benjamin D HorneSchool of Information Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5779-3019
Catherine A LutherSchool of Journalism and Electronic Media, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6117-7211
Joshua D BoryczStevenson Science and Engineering Library, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1505-148X
Suzie L AllardSchool of Information Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9421-3848
Damian J RuckSchool of Information Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8678-8852
Michael FitzgeraldPolitical Science Department, University Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-4454
Oleg ManaevCenter for Information and Communication Studies, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-3997
Brandon C PrinsPolitical Science Department, University Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5893-2167
Maureen TaylorSchool of Communication, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9420-3591
R Alexander BentleyDepartment of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9086-2197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysts of social media differ in their emphasis on the effects of message content versus social network structure. The balance of these factors may change substantially across time. When a major event occurs, initial independent reactions may give way to more social diffusion of interpretations of the event among different communities, including those committed to disinformation. Here, we explore these dynamics through a case study analysis of the Russian-language Twitter content emerging from Belarus before and after its presidential election of August 9, 2020. From these Russian-language tweets, we extracted a set of topics that characterize the social media data and construct networks to represent the sharing of these topics before and after the election. The case study in Belarus reveals how misinformation can be re-invigorated in discourse through the novelty of a major event. More generally, it suggests how audience networks can shift from influentials dispensing information before an event to a de-centralized sharing of information after it. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43545-022-00330-x.

Indexed as

Computational social scienceDisinformationTwitter analysis

Identifiers

PMID35434643
PMCPMC8990676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.