Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434619›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2022

Biomechanics of the Hammer Throw: Narrative Review.

Gian Mario Castaldi, Riccardo Borzuola, Valentina Camomilla, Elena Bergamini, Giuseppe Vannozzi, Andrea Macaluso

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rotation of the hammer and performance in hammer throwing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gian Mario CastaldiLaboratory of Bioengineering and Neuromechanics, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Riccardo BorzuolaLaboratory of Bioengineering and Neuromechanics, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Valentina CamomillaLaboratory of Bioengineering and Neuromechanics, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Elena BergaminiLaboratory of Bioengineering and Neuromechanics, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe VannozziLaboratory of Bioengineering and Neuromechanics, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Andrea MacalusoLaboratory of Bioengineering and Neuromechanics, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Foro Italico University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hammer throw is a discipline characterized by unique biomechanical features, which have often captured the interest of scientists and coaches in athletics. However, most studies have been published on technical journals for coaches and there are only few works on the biomechanical aspects of hammer throw in scientific literature. This narrative review provides a critical evaluation of the articles published in scientific and the most relevant technical journals with a particular focus on the biomechanical aspects that underlie the throwing technique and contribute to performance enhancement. The modern throwing technique has many elements in common with that used by the best throwers in the Eighties, underlying a limited development in the biomechanical understanding of throwing motion in recent years. This review analyses the ballistic and environmental aspects of the discipline as well as the motion of the center of mass of both the hammer and thrower. Furthermore, the orbital movement of the hammer and the forces involved in the throw are evaluated. This review emphasizes the kinematic and dynamic parameters that emerge as the most relevant to improve the throwing performance. Among these, linear release velocity appears to be a fundamental element. To maximize this variable, the athlete is required to accelerate the hammer by applying force. The curve of the time-tangential velocity of the hammer follows a trajectory very similar to that of the forces applied to the hammer-thrower system indicating a strong relationship between the two variables. The thrower uses the action of the leg muscles to gain momentum, which is then transferred to the hammer through the trunk and arm muscles, thus obtaining an increase of the linear release velocity. This review provides coaches with a critical analysis of the hammer throw technique, highlighting relevant factors for future development of training programmes. Our work reveals a substantial gap in the literature, particularly concerning the evaluation of fundamental key aspects of the throw such as the assessment of preliminary winds, the entry to the first turn and the definition of the rotation axes involved in the throw. A more in-depth analysis of these key elements is required to improve the understanding of the biomechanics of hammer throw.

Indexed as

athleticsbiomechanicshammer throwperformancetechniquethrowstrack and fields

Identifiers

PMID35434619
PMCPMC9008721
OpenAlexW4221049941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.