Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434599›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2022

Operational lessons learned in conducting an international study on pharmacovigilance in pregnancy in resource-constrained settings: The WHO Global Vaccine safety Multi-Country collaboration project.

Apoorva Sharan, Shubhashri Jahagirdar, Anke L Stuurman, Varalakshmi Elango, Margarita Riera-Montes, Neeraj Kumar Kashyap, Narendra Kumar Arora, Mathews Mathai, Punam Mangtani, Hugo Devlieger and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Apoorva SharanThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Shubhashri JahagirdarThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Anke L StuurmanP95 Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Leuven, Belgium.
Varalakshmi ElangoP95 Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Leuven, Belgium.
Margarita Riera-MontesP95 Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Leuven, Belgium.
Neeraj Kumar KashyapThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Narendra Kumar AroraThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Mathews MathaiCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Punam MangtaniDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Hugo DevliegerUniversitair Ziekenhuis, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven AndersonCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Barbee WhitakerCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Hui-Lee WongCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Clare L CutlandAfrican Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Alive), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Christine Guillard MaureDepartment of Regulation and Prequalification, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
WHO Global Vaccine Safety Multi-Country Collaboration Sites

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO Global Vaccine Safety Multi-Country Collaboration study on safety in pregnancy aims to estimate the minimum detectable risk for selected perinatal and neonatal outcomes and assess the applicability of standardized case definitions for study outcomes and maternal immunization in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper documents the operational lessons learned from the study. A prospective observational study was conducted across 21 hospitals in seven countries. All births occurring at sites were screened to identify select perinatal and neonatal outcomes from May 2019 to August 2020. Up to 100 cases per outcome were recruited to assess the applicability of standardized case definitions. A multi-pronged study quality assurance plan was implemented. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on site functioning and project implementation was also assessed. Multi-layered ethics and administrative approvals, limited clinical documentation, difficulty in identifying outcomes requiring in-hospital follow-up, and poor quality internet connectivity emerged as important barriers to study implementation. Use of electronic platforms, application of a rigorous quality assurance plan with frequent interaction between the central and site teams helped improve data quality. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted data collection for up to 6 weeks in some sites. Our study succeeded in establishing an international hospital-based surveillance network for evaluating perinatal and neonatal outcomes using common study protocol and procedures in geographically diverse sites with differing levels of infrastructure, clinical and health-utilization practices. The enhanced surveillance capacity of participating sites shall help support future pharmacovigilance efforts for pregnancy interventions.

Indexed as

Maternal healthMulti-country StudiesNeonatal healthPharmacovigilanceSurveillanceVaccine Safety

Identifiers

PMID35434599
PMCPMC8993756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.