Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434586›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model to aid coeliac disease diagnosis in primary care: An observational study.

Martha M C Elwenspoek, Rachel O'Donnell, Joni Jackson, Hazel Everitt, Peter Gillett, Alastair D Hay, Hayley E Jones, Gerry Robins, Jessica C Watson, Sue Mallett and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Martha M C ElwenspoekThe National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.
Rachel O'DonnellThe National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.
Joni JacksonThe National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.
Hazel EverittPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.
Peter GillettPaediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Department, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh EH9 1LF, Scotland, UK.
Alastair D HayPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Hayley E JonesPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Gerry RobinsDepartment of Gastroenterology, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, YO31 8HE, UK.
Jessica C WatsonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Sue MallettCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 2nd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Penny WhitingPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coeliac disease (CD) affects approximately 1% of the population, although only a fraction of patients are diagnosed. Our objective was to develop diagnostic prediction models to help decide who should be offered testing for CD in primary care. Methods: Logistic regression models were developed in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD (between Sep 9, 1987 and Apr 4, 2021, n=107,075) and externally validated in CPRD Aurum (between Jan 1, 1995 and Jan 15, 2021, n=227,915), two UK primary care databases, using (and controlling for) 1:4 nested case-control designs. Candidate predictors included symptoms and chronic conditions identified in current guidelines and using a systematic review of the literature. We used elastic-net regression to further refine the models. Findings: The prediction model included 24, 24, and 21 predictors for children, women, and men, respectively. For children, the strongest predictors were type 1 diabetes, Turner syndrome, IgA deficiency, or first-degree relatives with CD. For women and men, these were anaemia and first-degree relatives. In the development dataset, the models showed good discrimination with a Interpretation: These prediction models could help identify individuals with an increased risk of CD in relatively low prevalence populations such as primary care. Offering a serological test to these patients could increase case finding for CD. However, this involves offering tests to more people than is currently done. Further work is needed in prospective cohorts to refine and confirm the models and assess clinical and cost effectiveness. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (grant number NIHR129020).

Indexed as

Clinical prediction ruleCoeliac diseaseCPRDPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID35434586
PMCPMC9011008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.