Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434578›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike RBD protein vaccine: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1-2 clinical trial (ABDALA Study).

Francisco Hernández-Bernal, Maria C Ricardo-Cobas, Yenima Martín-Bauta, Zadis Navarro-Rodríguez, Marjoris Piñera-Martínez, Joel Quintana-Guerra, Karen Urrutia-Pérez, Klaudia Urrutia-Pérez, Cristina O Chávez-Chong, Jorge L Azor-Hernández and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Production and Immunogenicity Assessment of LTp50: AnPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco Hernández-BernalCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Maria C Ricardo-Cobas"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Yenima Martín-BautaCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Zadis Navarro-Rodríguez"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Marjoris Piñera-Martínez"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Joel Quintana-GuerraCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Karen Urrutia-PérezCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Klaudia Urrutia-PérezCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Cristina O Chávez-ChongInstitute of Cybernetics, Mathematics and Physics, Havana, Cuba.
Jorge L Azor-HernándezInstitute of Cybernetics, Mathematics and Physics, Havana, Cuba.
José L Rodríguez-ReinosoCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Leonardo Lobaina-Lambert"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Elizabeth Colina-Ávila"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Jacqueline Bizet-Almeida"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Jeniffer Rodríguez-Nuviola"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Sergio Del Valle-Piñera"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Mayara Ramírez-Domínguez"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Elisangela Tablada-Ferreiro"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Marel Alonso-ValdésCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Gilda Lemos-PérezCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Gerardo E Guillén-NietoCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Ariel Palenzuela-DíazImmunoassay Centre, Havana, Cuba.
Enrique Noa-RomeroCivilian Defense Scientific Research Centre, San José de las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba.
Miladys Limonta-FernándezCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Juan M Fernández-Ávila"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Nabil A Ali-Mros"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Lianne Del Toro-Lahera"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Rossana Remedios-Reyes"Saturnino Lora" Hospital, P.O. Box 90100, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Marta Ayala-ÁvilaCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Verena L Muzio-GonzálezCentre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, Cuba.
Centro de Ingeniería Genética y Biotecnología · CUInstituto de Cibernética Matemática y Física · CUCenter of Molecular Immunology (Cuba) · CU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple vaccine candidates against COVID-19 are currently being evaluated. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity protein of a novel SARS-CoV-2 virus receptor-binding domain (RBD) vaccine. Methods: A phase 1-2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in "Saturnino Lora" Hospital, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba. Subjects (healthy or those with controlled chronic diseases) aged between 19 and 80 years, who gave written informed consent were eligible. Subjects were randomly assigned (1:1:1, in blocks) to three groups: placebo, 25 µg and 50 µg RBD vaccine (Abdala). The product was administered intramuscularly, 0·5 mL in the deltoid region. During the first phase, two immunization schedules were studied: 0-14-28 days (short) and 0-28-56 days (long). In phase 2, only the short schedule was evaluated. The organoleptic characteristics and presentations of vaccine and placebo were identical. All participants (subjects, clinical researchers, statisticians, laboratory technicians, and monitors) remained masked during the study period. The main endpoints were safety and the proportion of subjects with seroconversion of anti-RBD IgG antibodies, analysed by intention to treat and per protocol, respectively. The trial is registered with the Cuban Public Registry of Clinical Trials, RPCEC00000346. Findings: Between Dec 7, 2020, and Feb 9, 2021, 792 subjects were included; 132 (66 in each vaccination schedule, divided into 22 for each group) in phase 1, and 660 (220 in each group plus 66 from the short scheme of phase 1) in phase 2. The product was well tolerated. No severe adverse events were reported. During phase 1, the incidence of adverse events in the 25 µg, 50 µg, and placebo arms for the short schedule were 6/22 (27·3%), 6/22 (27·3%), 3/22 (13·6%), respectively, and for the long schedule were 8/22 (36·4%), 9/22 (40·9%), 4/22 (18·2%), respectively. In phase 2, adverse reactions were reported by 53/242 (21·9%), 75/242 (31·0%) and 41/242 (16·9%) participants in the 25 µg, 50 µg, and placebo group, respectively. Adverse reactions were minimal, mostly mild, and from the injection site, which resolved in the first 24-48 hours. In phase 1, seroconversion at day 56 was seen in 95·2% of the participants (20/21) in the 50 μg group, 81% (17/21) in the 25 μg group, and none in the placebo group (0/22). For the long schedule, seroconversion at day 70 was seen in 100% of the participants (21/21) in the 50 μg group, 94·7% (18/19) in the 25 μg group, and none in the placebo group (0/22). In phase 2, seroconversion of anti-RBD IgG antibodies at day 56 was seen in 89·2% of the participants in the 50 μg group (214/240; 95% CI 84·5-92·82), 77·7% in the 25 μg group (185/238; 72·0-82·9) and 4·6% in the placebo group (11/239; 2·3-8·1). Compared with the placebo arm, the differences in the proportion of participants with seroconversion were 73·1% (95% CI 66·8-79·5) and 84·6% (79·4-89·7) in the 25 μg and 50 μg groups, respectively. The seroconversion rate in the 50 μg group was significantly higher than in the 25 μg group (p=0·0012). Interpretation: The Abdala vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and induced humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. These results, in the context of the emergency COVID-19 pandemic, support the 50 μg dose, applied in a 0-14-28 days schedule, for further clinical trials to confirm vaccine efficacy. Funding: Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB), Havana, Cuba.

Indexed as

Abdala vaccineCOVID-19Randomised clinical trialSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35434578
PMCPMC8994669
OpenAlexW4226174889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.