ArticleSN applied sciences2022
Exploring machine learning: a scientometrics approach using bibliometrix and VOSviewer.
Article in SN applied sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- MXene nanomaterials in biomedicine: A bibliometric perspective.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Pooled it
- Urban Green Space and Subjective Well-Being of Older People: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Exosomes in the Field of Neuroscience: A Scientometric Study and Visualization Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Mapping the scholarly landscape of Saudi Arabia-related folk medicine: a bibliometric study.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Agriculture: A Comprehensive Scientometric Review.Recent advances in food, nutrition & agriculture · 2026Review
- Research Trends and Knowledge Atlas of Radiotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment: A Bibliometric Analysis.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Intersections of Big Data and IoT in Academic Publications: A Topic Modeling Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping of diabetes mellitus combined with tuberculosis research: trends from 1995 to 2023.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Social Isolation Among Cancer Patients: A Bibliometric Analysis (2005-2024).Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Bibliometric and visual analyses of vaccine literacy research from 1982 to 2023.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Near-infrared spectroscopy in schizophrenia: A bibliometric perspective.World journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
- Exploring the Perspective of Oral Microbiome Studies in PubMed Database: A Bibliometric Appraisal.Cureus · 2024Review
- Article
- The Development of Floral Scent Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis (1987-2022).Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comprehensive analysis of research related to rehabilitation and COVID-19, hotspots, mapping, thematic evolution, trending topics, and future directions.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of RNA vaccines for cancer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- A bibliometric study on blockchain-based supply chain: a theme analysis, adopted methodologies, and future research agenda.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023Review
- Global research trends in palliative care for breast cancer from 2012 to 2022: A scientometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine Learning has found application in solving complex problems in different fields of human endeavors such as intelligent gaming, automated transportation, cyborg technology, environmental protection, enhanced health care, innovation in banking and home security, and smart homes. This research is motivated by the need to explore the global structure of machine learning to ascertain the level of bibliographic coupling, collaboration among research institutions, co-authorship network of countries, and sources coupling in publications on machine learning techniques. The Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) was applied to clustering prediction of authors dominance ranking in this paper. Publications related to machine learning were retrieved and extracted from the Dimensions database with no language restrictions. Bibliometrix was employed in computation and visualization to extract bibliographic information and perform a descriptive analysis. VOSviewer (version 1.6.16) tool was used to construct and visualize structure map of source coupling networks of researchers and co-authorship. About 10,814 research papers on machine learning published from 2010 to 2020 were retrieved for the research. Experimental results showed that the highest degree of betweenness centrality was obtained from cluster 3 with 153.86 from the University of California and Harvard University with 24.70. In cluster 1, the national university of Singapore has the highest degree betweenness of 91.72. Also, in cluster 5, the University of Cambridge (52.24) and imperial college London (4.52) having the highest betweenness centrality manifesting that he could control the collaborative relationship and that they possessed and controlled a large number of research resources. Findings revealed that this work has the potential to provide valuable guidance for new perspectives and future research work in the rapidly developing field of machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.