ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2022
How Is Context Addressed in Growth Monitoring? A Comparison of the Tanzanian, Indian, and Dutch Manuals.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global assessment of childhood growth monitoring: cross-sectional survey of national policies and practices.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- The Multiple Dimensions of Participation: Key Determinants of Nutrition Intervention Outcomes.Current developments in nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To address malnutrition in all its forms, context should be taken into account in growth-monitoring (GM) practices. Objectives: The aim was to compare GM manuals of countries with different nutrition problems, and to assess how these manuals are adapted to the different biological, socioeconomic, and cultural contexts. Methods: GM manuals from Tanzania, India, and the Netherlands were compared with each other, and with the materials for the WHO training course on child growth assessment. First, the aims of GM, growth measurements, interpretation of these measurements, and counseling approaches are compared. Second, contextual determinants of malnutrition are identified using the UNICEF framework for malnutrition as an analytical model. Results: Our results show that the GM manuals differ in their descriptions of the aim of GM, growth measurements, their interpretation, and counseling approaches. Assessing normal growth and detecting growth problems are among the aims of GM in all of the analyzed countries. In Tanzania and India, the focus is mainly on undernutrition, whereas the Dutch manuals focus on overweight and on underlying pathologies that contribute to poor linear growth. The findings of our analysis of contextual factors within the UNICEF framework show that the Tanzanian protocol is only minimally adapted to the local context. Of the manuals examined in our study, the Indian manual is most focused on the contextual determinants of malnutrition, and stresses the importance of taking customs and beliefs into account. The Dutch protocol, by contrast, emphasizes the importance of the biological environment, including parental height and ethnicity, as determinants of child growth. Conclusions: The country manuals we analyzed only partly reflect the contexts in which children live. To address malnutrition in all its forms, the GM manuals should take children's biological, socioeconomic, and cultural contexts into account, as this would help health professionals to tailor counseling messages for parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.