ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022
Vocal fold mucus layer: Comparison of histological protocols for visualization in mice.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of stem cell marker-positive subpopulations in the vocal fold of the larynx through transcriptomic analyses.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Ozone water enema activates SIRT1-Nrf2/HO-1 pathway to ameliorate gut dysbiosis in mice receiving COVID-19 patient-derived faecal microbiota.Journal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- Effects of psychosocial stress on laryngeal microbiology and epithelial barrier integrity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Goblet cell metaplasia and mucin alterations in biliary epithelial cells duringVeterinary world · 2025Article
- Article
- Differential Colonization and Mucus Ultrastructure Visualization in Bovine Ileal and Rectal Organoid-Derived Monolayers Exposed to EnterohemorrhagicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Vocal fold mucus layer: Comparison of histological protocols for visualization in mice.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: The epithelial associated mucus layer of vocal fold (VF) mucosa, plays an essential role in protecting and lubricating the tissue, as well as promoting normal voice quality. Serving as a habitat for laryngeal microbiota involved in the regulation of host immunity, VF mucus contributes to laryngeal health and disease. However, its unstable structure renders its' investigation challenging. We aim to establish a reproducible histological protocol to recover the natural appearance of the VF mucus layer for investigation. Methods: Using a murine model, we compared the suitability of multiple fixation methods-methacarn, formalin, and cryopreservation followed by post-fixation with formalin, paraformaldehyde (PFA), acetone, and two staining methods-Alcian Blue (pH 2.5)/Periodic Acid Schiff (AB/PAS) or PAS. Fixation and staining outcomes were evaluated based on the preservation of tissue morphology and mucus layer integrity. Mucin proteins, Muc1 and Muc4, were stained to validate the presence of mucus layer overlaying the VF mucosa. Results: Methacarn fixation followed by PAS staining was capable of preserving and displaying the smooth and continuous mucus layer, ensuring the determination of mucus thickness and mucin staining. Conclusions: Our study if the first to establish a histological protocol for the visualization of the in situ VF mucus layer whereby facilitating the study of VF mucus biology including VF surface hydration, ion/nutrients transports, biomechanical properties that maintains normal voice quality as well as VF pathophysiology and host-microbe interactions in the larynx. Level of Evidence: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.