Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434326›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022

Automatic classification of informative laryngoscopic images using deep learning.

Peter Yao, Dan Witte, Hortense Gimonet, Alexander German, Katerina Andreadis, Michael Cheng, Lucian Sulica, Olivier Elemento, Josue Barnes, Anaïs Rameau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Binary Classification of Laryngeal Images Utilising ResNet-50 CNN Architecture.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. An automated approach for real-time informative frames classification in laryngeal endoscopy using deep learning.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  13. A deep learning pipeline for automated classification of vocal fold polyps in flexible laryngoscopy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter YaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1127-9030
Dan WitteDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Hortense GimonetDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Alexander GermanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Katerina AndreadisDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8586-450X
Michael ChengDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Lucian SulicaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-2073
Olivier ElementoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Josue BarnesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Anaïs RameauDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-2634
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithm for automatic selection of informative frames in flexible laryngoscopic videos. The classifier has the potential to aid in the development of computer-aided diagnosis systems and reduce data processing time for clinician-computer scientist teams. Methods: A dataset of 22,132 laryngoscopic frames was extracted from 137 flexible laryngostroboscopic videos from 115 patients. 55 videos were from healthy patients with no laryngeal pathology and 82 videos were from patients with vocal fold polyps. The extracted frames were manually labeled as informative or uninformative by two independent reviewers based on vocal fold visibility, lighting, focus, and camera distance, resulting in 18,114 informative frames and 4018 uninformative frames. The dataset was split into training and test sets. A pre-trained ResNet-18 model was trained using transfer learning to classify frames as informative or uninformative. Hyperparameters were set using cross-validation. The primary outcome was precision for the informative class and secondary outcomes were precision, recall, and F1-score for all classes. The processing rate for frames between the model and a human annotator were compared. Results: The automated classifier achieved an informative frame precision, recall, and F1-score of 94.4%, 90.2%, and 92.3%, respectively, when evaluated on a hold-out test set of 4438 frames. The model processed frames 16 times faster than a human annotator. Conclusion: The CNN-based classifier demonstrates high precision for classifying informative frames in flexible laryngostroboscopic videos. This model has the potential to aid researchers with dataset creation for computer-aided diagnosis systems by automatically extracting relevant frames from laryngoscopic videos.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer‐aided diagnosiscomputer visionlaryngologymachine learningvocal fold polyp

Identifiers

PMID35434326
PMCPMC9008155
OpenAlexW4210936866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.