Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434321›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022

Stenting versus balloon dilatation in patients with tracheal benign stenosis: The STROBE trial.

Alessandro Marchioni, Dario Andrisani, Roberto Tonelli, Alessandro Andreani, Gaia Francesca Cappiello, Margherita Ori, Filippo Gozzi, Giulia Bruzzi, Chiara Nani, Raimondo Feminò and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Factors influencing outcomes in endoscopic management of post intubation tracheal stenosis with montgomery t tube placement.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandro MarchioniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Dario AndrisaniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Roberto TonelliRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6202-0758
Alessandro AndreaniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Gaia Francesca CappielloRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Margherita OriRespiratory Unit and Cystic Fibrosis Adult Center Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy.
Filippo GozziRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Giulia BruzziRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Chiara NaniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Raimondo FeminòAnesthesiology Unit University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Linda ManicardiRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Serena BaronciniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Francesco MattioliOtolaryngology Unit University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Matteo FermiOtolaryngology Unit University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Riccardo FantiniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Luca TabbìRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Ivana CastaniereRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Livio PresuttiAnesthesiology Unit University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
Enrico CliniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is well known that benign tracheal stenosis represents an obstacle to open surgery, and that its treatment could be challenging. Two endoscopic techniques have so far been adopted to restore tracheal patency: balloon dilatation (BA) through laryngoscopy, and tracheal stenting (ST) with rigid bronchoscopy. The main objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of BA and ST to treat benign tracheal stenosis not eligible for surgery. We also compared the rate of adverse events in the two treatment groups. Methods: A retrospective, observational cohort study was carried out at the University Hospital of Modena (Italy) from November 2012 to November 2017 in two separate departments. Patients were considered to be "stabilized" (primary outcome) if they did not report significant respiratory symptoms, or restenosis in the long-term (2 years) following the endoscopic procedure. Results: Sixty-six patients were included in the study (33 in the BA and 33 in the ST group, respectively). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a greater therapeutic effect of ST compared to BA at 2 years (hazard ratio = 3.9 95%CI [1.5-9.8], Conclusions: Compared to BA, ST seems to be more effective in achieving stabilization of tracheal patency in complex benign tracheal stenosis, although burdened with a significantly higher number of adverse effects. These findings warrant future prospective study for confirmation.

Indexed as

balloon dilatationbenign tracheal stenosisrigid bronchoscopytracheal stenting

Identifiers

PMID35434321
PMCPMC9008152
OpenAlexW4213063986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.