Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434318›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022

Voice rest after vocal fold polyp surgery: A Swedish register study of 588 patients.

Gunnar Björck, Stellan Hertegård, Jan Ekelund, Elin Marsk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gunnar BjörckDivision of Ear, Nose and Throat, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Phoniatric Section Karolinska University Hospital, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5074-9656
Stellan HertegårdDivision of Ear, Nose and Throat, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Phoniatric Section Karolinska University Hospital, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9918-6655
Jan EkelundCenter of Registers Gothenburg Sweden.
Elin MarskDivision of Ear, Nose and Throat, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Phoniatric Section Karolinska University Hospital, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of voice rest on patient-reported voice outcome 4 months after vocal fold polyp surgery. Methods: Preoperative information was collected about age, sex, and smoking habits and the voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10). Four months postoperatively, voice rest (total voice rest, spoke single words, and spoke normally), and pre and postoperative voice therapy were reported. This was correlated to voice satisfaction from a two-category subjective evaluation "satisfied/ not satisfied" and to VHI-10. Logistic regression models with relative risk for NOT being satisfied with voice after surgery were performed. Results: Data from 588 patients were available. The group "spoke normally" showed the highest degree of patient satisfaction (92%). Younger patients (<59 years) were more satisfied than older (90% vs. 81.5%). High age and low VHI-10 scores before surgery were statistically significant for negative voice outcome. Gender or voice rest type did not significantly affect outcome. The largest improvement in VHI-scores was in the group who Conclusion: We found no significant difference in the two-category subjective voice outcome depending on voice rest. VHI-10 showed a statistically significant positive effect on self-evaluated voice outcome, with the largest improvement in the group with no voice rest. However, the clinical relevance of the VHI changes is unclear. The present study does not show any advantage of total voice rest as compared to relative voice rest or speaking freely. High age and low preoperative VHI scores were significant risk factors for worse voice outcome.

Indexed as

microlaryngeal surgeryVHI‐10voice therapy

Identifiers

PMID35434318
PMCPMC9008164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.