ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022
Voice rest after vocal fold polyp surgery: A Swedish register study of 588 patients.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Correlation Between Surgical Depth and Postoperative Voice Rest Duration in a Rabbit Phonomicrosurgery Model.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Pre- and Postoperative Voice Therapy for Benign Vocal Fold Lesions: An International Electronic Delphi Consensus Study.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Article
- The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection on Short Term Vocal Outcomes Following Phonosurgery-A Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Voice rest after vocal fold polyp surgery: A Swedish register study of 588 patients.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of voice rest on patient-reported voice outcome 4 months after vocal fold polyp surgery. Methods: Preoperative information was collected about age, sex, and smoking habits and the voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10). Four months postoperatively, voice rest (total voice rest, spoke single words, and spoke normally), and pre and postoperative voice therapy were reported. This was correlated to voice satisfaction from a two-category subjective evaluation "satisfied/ not satisfied" and to VHI-10. Logistic regression models with relative risk for NOT being satisfied with voice after surgery were performed. Results: Data from 588 patients were available. The group "spoke normally" showed the highest degree of patient satisfaction (92%). Younger patients (<59 years) were more satisfied than older (90% vs. 81.5%). High age and low VHI-10 scores before surgery were statistically significant for negative voice outcome. Gender or voice rest type did not significantly affect outcome. The largest improvement in VHI-scores was in the group who Conclusion: We found no significant difference in the two-category subjective voice outcome depending on voice rest. VHI-10 showed a statistically significant positive effect on self-evaluated voice outcome, with the largest improvement in the group with no voice rest. However, the clinical relevance of the VHI changes is unclear. The present study does not show any advantage of total voice rest as compared to relative voice rest or speaking freely. High age and low preoperative VHI scores were significant risk factors for worse voice outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.