Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434307›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Moral Distress Experienced by US Nurses on the Frontlines During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Nursing Policy and Practice.

Shannon D Simonovich, Kashica J Webber-Ritchey, Roxanne S Spurlark, Kristine Florczak, Lucy Mueller Wiesemann, Tiffany N Ponder, Madeline Reid, Denita Shino, Bonnie R Stevens, Elizabeth Aquino and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Interventions to Address Moral Distress: A Multi-method Approach.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shannon D SimonovichSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-9221
Kashica J Webber-RitcheySchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Roxanne S SpurlarkSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kristine FlorczakCollege of Nursing, Purdue University Northwest, Hammond, IN, USA.
Lucy Mueller WiesemannSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tiffany N PonderSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Madeline ReidSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Denita ShinoSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bonnie R StevensSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elizabeth AquinoSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Donna BadowskiSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christina LattnerSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-5395
Cheryl SocoSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Susan KrawczykSchool of Nurse Anesthesia, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Kim AmerSchool of Nursing, College of Science & Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic represents the largest contemporary challenge to the nursing workforce in the 21 Methods: One hundred individual interviews were conducted with nurses across the United States from May to September of 2020 asking participants to describe how they felt taking care of COVID-19 patients. All interviews followed a semi-structured interview guide, were audio recorded, transcribed, verified, and coded by the research team. Results: Participants narratives of the emotions they experienced providing patient care during COVID-19 unequivocally described (1) moral distress, and moral distress related (1.1) fear, (1.2) frustration, (1.3) powerlessness, and (1.4) guilt. In sum, the major emotional response of nurses across the US providing patient care during the pandemic was that of moral distress. Conclusion: Investments in healthcare infrastructures that address moral distress in nurses may improve retention and reduce burnout in the US nursing workforce.

Indexed as

COVID-19mental healthpublic healthqualitative researchresearchworkforce

Identifiers

PMID35434307
PMCPMC8995195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.