Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434299›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2022

Development of Written Materials for Participants in an Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Screening Trial.

Katharine J Head, Jane A Hartsock, Tamilyn Bakas, Malaz A Boustani, Matthew Schroeder, Nicole R Fowler

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine J HeadDepartment of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-1716
Jane A HartsockCollege of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Tamilyn BakasCollege of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Malaz A BoustaniDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Matthew SchroederRegenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Nicole R FowlerDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Regenstrief Institute · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Indianapolis · US

Funding

The Caregiver Outcomes of Alzheimer's Disease Screening (COADS) TrialR01AG056325 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI FOWLER, NICOLE R. · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given that participants' experiences in clinical trials include a variety of communication touchpoints with clinical trial staff, these communications should be designed in a way that enhances the participant experience by paying attention to the self-determination theoretical concepts of competence, autonomy, and relatedness. In this feature, we argue that clinical trial teams need to consider the importance of how they design their written participant communication materials, and we explain in detail the process our multidisciplinary team took to design written materials for the patient and family caregiver participants in our Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) screening trial. This article concludes with suggested guidance and steps for other clinical trial teams.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasebest practicescaregiverscommunicationdementiafamilyscreeningself-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID35434299
PMCPMC9009139
OpenAlexW4225725066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.