Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434282›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2022

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Acute Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients Using Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Urine Samples: A Multicenter Diagnostic Phase III Trial.

Wilfried Gwinner, Annika Karch, Jan H Braesen, Abedalrazag A Khalifa, Jochen Metzger, Maarten Naesens, Elisabet Van Loon, Dany Anglicheau, Pierre Marquet, Klemens Budde and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Noninvasive Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Rejection.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Wilfried GwinnerDepartment of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Annika KarchInstitute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jan H BraesenDepartment of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Abedalrazag A KhalifaDepartment of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jochen MetzgerMosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
Maarten NaesensDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Elisabet Van LoonDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dany AnglicheauDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, AP-HP and Inserm U1151, Paris, France.
Pierre MarquetPharmacology and Transplantation, INSERM U1248, Université de Limoges, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Klemens BuddeCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mareen MatzCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang ArnsCologne Merheim Medical Center, Cologne, Germany.
Michael FischerederLMU-Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Antje HabichtLMU-Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Ute EisenbergerUniversity Hospital Essen, Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Anja MühlfeldClinic for Renal and Hypertensive Disorders, Rheumatological and Immunological Diseases, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Martin BuschDepartment of Internal Medicine III/Collaborative Kidney Transplant Center, University Hospital Jena-Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Michael WiesenerDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Irina ScheffnerDepartment of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Armin KochInstitute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely recognition and treatment of acute kidney graft rejection is important to prevent premature graft failure. A predefined urinary marker set for acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) containing 14 peptides was tested for this purpose in a multicenter in-place validation study. Methods: Three hundred twenty-nine prospectively collected and 306 archived urine samples from 11 transplant centers in Germany, France, and Belgium were examined. Samples were taken immediately before a biopsy, performed for graft dysfunction within the first transplant year. Primary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of the marker set for the diagnosis of biopsy-proven acute TCMR, with prespecified thresholds of 83% for sensitivity and 70% for specificity. Results: Eighty-two patients (13%) had acute TCMR grade I-III. In relation to the biopsy diagnosis of TCMR, the sensitivity of the urine test was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.76) and the specificity 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.51), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.60. The different TCMR grades I-III were not reflected by the marker set, and borderline TCMR was not specifically detected. Secondary independent masked assessment of biopsies consented by 2 pathologists revealed an interobserver kappa value of 0.49 for diagnosing TCMR, compared with the local center's diagnosis. Using this consensus diagnosis, the AUC of the urine test was 0.63 (sensitivity 0.73, specificity 0.45). Post hoc optimization of the marker set improved the diagnostic performance in the study cohort (AUC 0.67) and in an independent patient cohort (AUC 0.69). Conclusions: This study illustrates the difficulty of proteomics-based diagnosis of TCMR and highlights the need for rigorous independent in-place validation and optimization of diagnostic biomarkers.

Identifiers

PMID35434282
PMCPMC9005257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.