Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434273›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy oncolytics2022

CAR T cell therapy and the tumor microenvironment: Current challenges and opportunities.

Lionel A Kankeu Fonkoua, Olivia Sirpilla, Reona Sakemura, Elizabeth L Siegler, Saad S Kenderian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy oncolytics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 186 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cellular immunotherapy in melanoma: the next frontier in cancer treatment.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lionel A Kankeu FonkouaT Cell Engineering Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Olivia SirpillaT Cell Engineering Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Reona SakemuraT Cell Engineering Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Elizabeth L SieglerT Cell Engineering Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Saad S KenderianT Cell Engineering Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable outcomes in individuals with hematological malignancies, but its success has been hindered by barriers intrinsic to the tumor microenvironment (TME), particularly for solid tumors, where it has yet to make its mark. In this article, we provide an updated review and future perspectives on features of the TME that represent barriers to CART cell therapy efficacy, including competition for metabolic fuels, physical barriers to infiltration, and immunosuppressive factors. We then discuss novel and promising strategies to overcome these obstacles that are in preclinical development or under clinical investigation.

Indexed as

chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapyimmunosuppressionmetabolic fuelsphysical barrierstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35434273
PMCPMC8980704
OpenAlexW4220841520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.