Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434263›Full record

ReviewApplied materials today2022

State-of-the-art review of advanced electrospun nanofiber yarn-based textiles for biomedical applications.

Shaohua Wu, Ting Dong, Yiran Li, Mingchao Sun, Ye Qi, Jiao Liu, Mitchell A Kuss, Shaojuan Chen, Bin Duan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied materials today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Application of PLCL as a biodegradable polymer in biomedical engineering.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Engineering Nanoparticles and Bioscaffolds for Targeted microRNA Delivery in Cardiovascular Regeneration-A Comprehensive Review.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaohua WuCollege of Textiles & Clothing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Ting DongCollege of Textiles & Clothing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yiran LiCollege of Textiles & Clothing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Mingchao SunCollege of Textiles & Clothing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Ye QiCollege of Textiles & Clothing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jiao LiuCollege of Textiles & Clothing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Mitchell A KussMary & Dick Holland Regenerative Medicine Program and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Shaojuan ChenCollege of Textiles & Clothing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Bin DuanMary & Dick Holland Regenerative Medicine Program and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Qingdao University · CNUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has made biotextiles, including face masks and protective clothing, quite familiar in our daily lives. Biotextiles are one broad category of textile products that are beyond our imagination. Currently, biotextiles have been routinely utilized in various biomedical fields, like daily protection, wound healing, tissue regeneration, drug delivery, and sensing, to improve the health and medical conditions of individuals. However, these biotextiles are commonly manufactured with fibers with diameters on the micrometer scale (> 10 μm). Recently, nanofibrous materials have aroused extensive attention in the fields of fiber science and textile engineering because the fibers with nanoscale diameters exhibited obviously superior performances, such as size and surface/interface effects as well as optical, electrical, mechanical, and biological properties, compared to microfibers. A combination of innovative electrospinning techniques and traditional textile-forming strategies opens a new window for the generation of nanofibrous biotextiles to renew and update traditional microfibrous biotextiles. In the last two decades, the conventional electrospinning device has been widely modified to generate nanofiber yarns (NYs) with the fiber diameters less than 1000 nm. The electrospun NYs can be further employed as the primary processing unit for manufacturing a new generation of nano-textiles using various textile-forming strategies. In this review, starting from the basic information of conventional electrospinning techniques, we summarize the innovative electrospinning strategies for NY fabrication and critically discuss their advantages and limitations. This review further covers the progress in the construction of electrospun NY-based nanotextiles and their recent applications in biomedical fields, mainly including surgical sutures, various scaffolds and implants for tissue engineering, smart wearable bioelectronics, and their current and potential applications in the COVID-19 pandemic. At the end, this review highlights and identifies the future needs and opportunities of electrospun NYs and NY-based nanotextiles for clinical use.

Indexed as

bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factorCNT, carbon nanotubeCOVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019ECM, extracellular matrixElectrospinningFDA, food and drug administrationGF, gauge factorGO, graphene oxideHAp, hydroxyapatiteHAVIC, human aortic valve interstitial cellMeGel, methacrylated gelatinMSC, mesenchymal stem cellMSC-SC, MSC derived Schwann cell-like cellMWCNT, multiwalled carbon nanotubeMY, microfiber yarnNanoyarnsNGC, nerve guidance conduitNHMR, neutral hollow metal rodNMD, neutral metal discNY, nanofiber yarnPA66, polyamide 66PA6, polyamide 6PANi, polyanilinePAN, polyacrylonitrilePCL, polycaprolactonePEO, polyethylene oxidePGA, polyglycolidePHBV, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)PLCL, poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone)PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)PLLA, poly(L-lactic acid)PMIA, poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide)PPDO, polydioxanonePPy, polypyrrolePSA, poly(sulfone amide)PU, polyurethanePVAc, poly(vinyl acetate)PVA, poly(vinyl alcohol)PVDF-HFP, poly(vinylidene floride-co-hexafluoropropylene)PVDF, poly(vinylidene difluoride)PVDF-TrFE, poly(vinylidene fluoride trifluoroethylene)PVP, poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2SC, Schwann cellSF, silk fibroinSWCNT, single-walled carbon nanotubeTextile-forming techniqueTGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1Tissue scaffoldsVEGF, vascular endothelial growth factorWearable bioelectronics

Identifiers

PMID35434263
PMCPMC8994858
OpenAlexW4223548181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.