ArticleData in brief2022
Synthetic data for design and evaluation of binary classifiers in the context of Bayesian transfer learning.
Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synthetic data for design and evaluation of binary classifiers in the context of Bayesian transfer learning.Data in brief · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transfer learning (TL) techniques can enable effective learning in data scarce domains by allowing one to re-purpose data or scientific knowledge available in relevant source domains for predictive tasks in a target domain of interest. In this Data in Brief article, we present a synthetic dataset for binary classification in the context of Bayesian transfer learning, which can be used for the design and evaluation of TL-based classifiers. For this purpose, we consider numerous combinations of classification settings, based on which we simulate a diverse set of feature-label distributions with varying learning complexity. For each set of model parameters, we provide a pair of target and source datasets that have been jointly sampled from the underlying feature-label distributions in the target and source domains, respectively. For both target and source domains, the data in a given class and domain are normally distributed, where the distributions across domains are related to each other through a joint prior. To ensure the consistency of the classification complexity across the provided datasets, we have controlled the Bayes error such that it is maintained within a range of predefined values that mimic realistic classification scenarios across different relatedness levels. The provided datasets may serve as useful resources for designing and benchmarking transfer learning schemes for binary classification as well as the estimation of classification error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.