ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2022
Comparison the Emergency Severity Index and Manchester Triage System in Trauma Patients.
Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Manchester Triage System: Effectiveness, Limitations, and Global Implementation-A Structured Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative performance of manual triage systems and ML models in predicting clinical outcomes among patients transported to the emergency department by emergency medical services.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of the Manchester Triage System and emergency severity index in predicting critical events in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- The association between urgency level and hospital admission, mortality and resource utilization in three emergency department triage systems: an observational multicenter study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Perspective on the ethics of AI at the intersection of nutrition and behaviour change.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
- Drinking from the Holy Grail-Does a Perfect Triage System Exist? And Where to Look for It?Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Use of Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Simplified Motor Score in a Five-Level Triage System: Identifying Trauma in Adult Patients at a High Risk of Mortality.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Development and content validation of a risk classification instrument.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the emergency severity index (ESI) and Manchester triage system (MTS) in trauma patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted by census method in Hasheminejad hospital during 2019. Patients referred to a trauma center triaged by five trained triage nurses based on ESI and MTS. Outcomes were considered as length of stay at the emergency department, admission to the other sectors and discharge or leave the hospital. Information from the triage form, nursing registry office and hospital registry system were extracted and analyzed by SPSS software. Results: Totally 447 and 468 patients triaged with the ESI and MTS were included, respectively. Seventy percent of patients triaged with ESI and 34% with MTS were placed in level 3 or the yellow group (equivalent group 3 triage). The hospitalization rate is approximately equal at each triage level in the both systems. The mortality rate in both groups was 0%. Mean length of stay was significantly lower in the MTS group compared to ESI in the emergency department ( Conclusion: Using of ESI triage in the trauma center causes to arrive more patients to the emergency department instead of the fast track and leads to waste the time and energy of staff'. However, further studies are needed to prove this result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.