Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433990›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Using the apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: comparison among three region of interest selection methods.

Xiaochuan Geng, Dandan Zhang, Shiteng Suo, Jie Chen, Fang Cheng, Kebei Zhang, Qing Zhang, Lan Li, Yang Lu, Jia Hua and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaochuan Geng *Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Dandan Zhang *Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shiteng SuoDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fang ChengDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kebei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lan LiDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yang LuDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jia HuaDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhiguo ZhuangDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value using histogram analysis is helpful to predict responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. However, the measurement method has not reached a consensus. This study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the ADC histogram analysis at predicting patient response prior to NAC in breast cancer patients using different region of interest (ROI) selection methods. Methods: A total of 75 patients who underwent diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) prior to NAC were retrospectively enrolled from February 2017 to December 2019. Images were measured using small 2-dimensional (2D) ROI, large 2D ROI, and volume ROI methods. The measurement time and ROI size were recorded. Histopathologic responses were acquired using the Miller-Payne grading system after surgery. The inter- and intra-observer repeatability was analyzed and the ADC histogram values from the three ROI methods were compared. The efficacy of each method at predicting patient response prior to NAC was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the whole study population and subgroups according to molecular subtype. Results: Among the 75 enrolled patients, 26 (34.67%) were responsive to NAC therapy. The ADC histogram values were significantly different among the three ROI methods (P≤0.038). Inter- and intra-observer repeatability of the large 2D ROI method and the volume ROI method was generally greater than that observed with the 2D ROI method. The 10% ADC value of the large 2D ROI method showed the greatest AUC (0.701) in the whole study population and in the luminal subgroup (AUC 0.804). The volume ROI method required significantly more time than the other two ROI methods (P<0.001). Conclusions: The small 2D ROI method is not appropriate for predicting response prior to NAC in breast cancer patients due to the poor repeatability. When choosing the ROI method and the histogram parameters for predicting response prior to NAC in breast cancer patients using ADC-derived histogram analysis, 10% of the large 2D ROI method is recommended, especially in luminal A subtype patients.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmsdiffusion magnetic resonance imagingneoadjuvant therapyobserver variation

Identifiers

PMID35433990
PMCPMC9011214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.