Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433928›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

The level and efficacy of lutein in patients with age-related macular degeneration: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yunjie Liu, Mengmei Ni, Rui Wu, Zhirui Yang, Xuejiao Zhu, Jinyao Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yunjie Liu *West China School of Public Health (West China Fourth Hospital), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mengmei Ni *West China School of Public Health (West China Fourth Hospital), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Rui WuChongqing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing, China.
Zhirui YangWest China School of Public Health (West China Fourth Hospital), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xuejiao ZhuWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jinyao ChenWest China School of Public Health (West China Fourth Hospital), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lutein has been linked with various visual performance disorders, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, previous studies evaluating the association between serum lutein and the risk of AMD showed results, and the efficacy of lutein intake in AMD patients remains unclear. Methods: To comprehensively estimate the relationship between lutein and AMD, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching eligible randomized clinical trials (RCT) and case-control studies to study the association between lutein and AMD on the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Elsevier, PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) databases until April 2020. The weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was adopted as the primary effect estimate. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0. Results: Nine studies with 855 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The NOS scoring of five case-control studies ranged 5-9. For RCTs, two studies were rated with a low risk of bias, one study with a moderate risk of bias and one with a high risk of bias. The results increased significantly in macular pigment optical density (MPOD) (WMD =0.069; 95% CI: 0.040-0.098, P=0.000) among AMD patients taking lutein supplementation, while there was no difference in circulating lutein levels between AMD patients and controls (WMD =0.00; 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.00, P=0.310). Subgroup analysis suggested that the dose and duration of supplementation could significantly influence the MPOD level in AMD patients. In particular, we observed a larger increase in MPOD of AMD patients using a higher dose (20 mg/d) and longer treatment (>6 months). Conclusions: Although current evidence does not support circulating lutein as a biomarker for early screening of the high-risk AMD population, this study is the first meta-analysis to explore the relationship between lutein in blood and AMD patients. Given that lutein has a high safety profile as indicated by many studies, it is reasonable to give the current analysis result that high dose (20 mg/d) and long duration (>6 months) of lutein intake could be beneficial to AMD patients.

Indexed as

age-related macular degeneration (AMD)Lutein supplementsmacular pigment optical density (MPOD)

Identifiers

PMID35433928
PMCPMC9011220
OpenAlexW4224211826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.