ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
The level and efficacy of lutein in patients with age-related macular degeneration: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for slowing the progression of age-related macular degeneration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Iontophoresis Drug Delivery to the Macula of Lutein for Age Related Macular Degeneration.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Structural characterization and bioaccessibility of nanoliposomal lutein from pumpkin extract.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Supplements to Sight: Quantifying the Impact of Lutein and Carotenoid on Age-Related Macular Degeneration-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Exploring Cyclodextrin Complexes of Lipophilic Antioxidants: Benefits and Challenges in Nutraceutical Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Perspectives of traditional herbal medicines in treating retinitis pigmentosa.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Xanthophyll pigments dietary supplements administration and retinal health in the context of increasing life expectancy trend.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lutein has been linked with various visual performance disorders, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, previous studies evaluating the association between serum lutein and the risk of AMD showed results, and the efficacy of lutein intake in AMD patients remains unclear. Methods: To comprehensively estimate the relationship between lutein and AMD, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching eligible randomized clinical trials (RCT) and case-control studies to study the association between lutein and AMD on the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Elsevier, PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) databases until April 2020. The weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was adopted as the primary effect estimate. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0. Results: Nine studies with 855 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The NOS scoring of five case-control studies ranged 5-9. For RCTs, two studies were rated with a low risk of bias, one study with a moderate risk of bias and one with a high risk of bias. The results increased significantly in macular pigment optical density (MPOD) (WMD =0.069; 95% CI: 0.040-0.098, P=0.000) among AMD patients taking lutein supplementation, while there was no difference in circulating lutein levels between AMD patients and controls (WMD =0.00; 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.00, P=0.310). Subgroup analysis suggested that the dose and duration of supplementation could significantly influence the MPOD level in AMD patients. In particular, we observed a larger increase in MPOD of AMD patients using a higher dose (20 mg/d) and longer treatment (>6 months). Conclusions: Although current evidence does not support circulating lutein as a biomarker for early screening of the high-risk AMD population, this study is the first meta-analysis to explore the relationship between lutein in blood and AMD patients. Given that lutein has a high safety profile as indicated by many studies, it is reasonable to give the current analysis result that high dose (20 mg/d) and long duration (>6 months) of lutein intake could be beneficial to AMD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.