Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433854›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Hypertension and Its Associated Factors Using Population-Level Data From Three South Asian Countries.

Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam, Ashis Talukder, Md Abdul Awal, Md Muhammad Umer Siddiqui, Md Martuza Ahamad, Benojir Ahammed, Lal B Rawal, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Jemal Abawajy, Liliana Laranjo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. An interpretable combinatorial data-mining framework for predicting new-onset hypertension in the general population.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Psychometric properties comparison of EQ-5D-Y-3L and CHU9D in children and adolescents across different BMI classifications in Jiangsu, China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Machine learning insights into patient satisfaction following lateral lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sheikh Mohammed Shariful IslamInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ashis TalukderStatistics Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Md Abdul AwalElectronics and Communication Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Md Muhammad Umer SiddiquiDepartment of Hospital Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Md Martuza AhamadDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, Bangladesh.
Benojir AhammedStatistics Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Lal B RawalSchool of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Roohallah AlizadehsaniInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Jemal AbawajySchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Liliana LaranjoFaculty of Medicine and Health, Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clara K ChowFaculty of Medicine and Health, Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ralph MaddisonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is the most common modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in South Asia. Machine learning (ML) models have been shown to outperform clinical risk predictions compared to statistical methods, but studies using ML to predict hypertension at the population level are lacking. This study used ML approaches in a dataset of three South Asian countries to predict hypertension and its associated factors and compared the model's performances. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using ML analyses to detect hypertension using population-based surveys. We created a single dataset by harmonizing individual-level data from the most recent nationally representative Demographic and Health Survey in Bangladesh, Nepal, and India. The variables included blood pressure (BP), sociodemographic and economic factors, height, weight, hemoglobin, and random blood glucose. Hypertension was defined based on JNC-7 criteria. We applied six common ML-based classifiers: decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), logistic regression (LR), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to predict hypertension and its risk factors. Results: Of the 8,18,603 participants, 82,748 (10.11%) had hypertension. ML models showed that significant factors for hypertension were age and BMI. Ever measured BP, education, taking medicine to lower BP, and doctor's perception of high BP was also significant but comparatively lower than age and BMI. XGBoost, GBM, LR, and LDA showed the highest accuracy score of 90%, RF and DT achieved 89 and 83%, respectively, to predict hypertension. DT achieved the precision value of 91%, and the rest performed with 90%. XGBoost, GBM, LR, and LDA achieved a recall value of 100%, RF scored 99%, and DT scored 90%. In F1-score, XGBoost, GBM, LR, and LDA scored 95%, while RF scored 94%, and DT scored 90%. All the algorithms performed with good and small log loss values <6%. Conclusion: ML models performed well to predict hypertension and its associated factors in South Asians. When employed on an open-source platform, these models are scalable to millions of people and might help individuals self-screen for hypertension at an early stage. Future studies incorporating biochemical markers are needed to improve the ML algorithms and evaluate them in real life.

Indexed as

algorithmsartificial intelligenceblood pressurecardiovascular diseasesDemographic and Health Surveyrisk factorsSouth Asia

Identifiers

PMID35433854
PMCPMC9008259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.