Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433803›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Risk Factors, Prognostic Factors, and Nomograms for Bone Metastasis in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Large Population-Based Study.

Hongmin Zhou, Sheng Yang, Tiancheng Xie, Longfei Wang, Sen Zhong, Tianyang Sheng, Guoxin Fan, Xiang Liao, Yunfei Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The dilemma of partial nephrectomy and surgical upstaging.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hongmin ZhouDepartment of urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sheng YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tiancheng XieDepartment of urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Longfei WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sen ZhongShanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tianyang ShengShanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Guoxin FanNational Key Clinical Pain Medicine of China, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiang LiaoNational Key Clinical Pain Medicine of China, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yunfei XuDepartment of urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CNUnion Hospital · CNShanghai East Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate risk factors and prognostic factors in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with bone metastasis (BM) and establish nomograms to provide a quantitative prediction of the risk of BM and survival probability. Methods: The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with ccRCC between January 2010 and December 2015 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Independent factors for BM in ccRCC patients were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Prognostic factors for predicting cancer-specific death were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses based on a competing risk regression model. We then constructed a diagnostic nomogram and a prognostic nomogram. The two nomograms were evaluated using calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic curves, and decision curve analysis. Results: Our study included 34,659 patients diagnosed with ccRCC in the SEER database, with 1,415 patients who presented with bone metastasis. Risk factors for BM in patients with ccRCC included age, stage T, stage N, brain metastasis, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, tumor size, and laterality. Independent prognostic factors for patients with ccRCC patients with BM were Fuhrman grade, tumor size, T stage, N stage, brain metastases, lung metastasis, and surgery. For the diagnostic nomogram, the area under the curve values in the training and testing cohorts were 0.863 (95% CI, 0.851-0.875) and 0.859 (95% CI, 0.839-0.878), respectively. In the prognostic cohort, the area under the curve values for 1-, 2-, and 3-year cancer-specific survival rates in the training cohort were 0.747, 0.774, and 0.780, respectively, and 0.671, 0.706, and 0.696, respectively, in the testing cohort. Through calibration curves and decision curve analyses, the nomograms displayed excellent performance. Conclusions: Several factors related to the development and prognosis of BM in patients with ccRCC were identified. The nomograms constructed in this study are expected to become effective and precise tools for clinicians to improve cancer management.

Indexed as

bone metastasisclear cell renal cell carcinomanomogramsprognostic factorsSEER

Identifiers

PMID35433803
PMCPMC9011336
OpenAlexW4220891806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.